Fani Neto
Impact in
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Nerve injury and regeneration
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 5%
- Stress Responses and Cortisol
Papers in
- Physiology 36
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments 36
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 12
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology 10
- Nerve injury and regeneration 9
- Co-authors
- José Manuel Castro‐Lopes (25 shared papers)J.A. Micó (9 shared papers)Esther Berrocoso (9 shared papers)Gisela Borges (8 shared papers)Joana Ferreira‐Gomes (12 shared papers)Jan Schadrack (5 shared papers)Meritxell Llorca-Torralba (1 shared paper)Sonia Torres-Sánchez (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Fani Neto
43 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 631
- Behavioral Neuroscience 122
- Physiology 791
- Biological Psychiatry 52
- Developmental Neuroscience 54
Countries citing papers authored by Fani Neto
This map shows the geographic impact of Fani Neto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fani Neto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fani Neto more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fani Neto
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fani Neto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fani Neto. The network helps show where Fani Neto may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fani Neto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 158 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 120 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 74 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 73 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 72 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 60 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 52 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 51 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 49 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 43 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 41 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 35 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 33 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 32 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 32 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 30 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 29 | |
| 18 | 2000 | 28 | |
| 19 | 2006 | 27 | |
| 20 | 2006 | 27 |
About Fani Neto
Fani Neto is a scholar working on Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Molecular Biology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (36 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (12 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (10 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (9 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (4 papers), Healthcare and Venom Research (4 papers) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (631 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (122 citations), Physiology (791 citations), Biological Psychiatry (52 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (54 citations). Fani Neto has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Spain and Germany. Frequent co-authors include José Manuel Castro‐Lopes, J.A. Micó, Esther Berrocoso, Gisela Borges, Joana Ferreira‐Gomes, Jan Schadrack, Meritxell Llorca-Torralba, Sonia Torres-Sánchez, Catarina Soares Potes and W. Zieglgänsberger. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pain, Neuroscience, Pain, The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology and Anesthesiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.