José Manuel Castro‐Lopes
- Physiology top 1%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Molecular Biology
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 1%
- Co-authors
- Antonio CoimbraFani NetoLuís Filipe AzevedoIsaura TavaresJoana Ferreira‐GomesThomas R. TölleSara AdãesLiliane Mendonça
- Topics
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (44 papers)Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (19 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (19 papers)
- Partner nations
- PortugalGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
José Manuel Castro‐Lopes
93 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
- Physiology 1.6k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.1k
- Pharmacology 748
- Molecular Biology 515
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 316
Countries citing papers authored by José Manuel Castro‐Lopes
This map shows the geographic impact of José Manuel Castro‐Lopes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by José Manuel Castro‐Lopes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites José Manuel Castro‐Lopes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by José Manuel Castro‐Lopes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by José Manuel Castro‐Lopes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by José Manuel Castro‐Lopes. The network helps show where José Manuel Castro‐Lopes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of José Manuel Castro‐Lopes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of José Manuel Castro‐Lopes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of José Manuel Castro‐Lopes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with José Manuel Castro‐Lopes. José Manuel Castro‐Lopes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 36 | |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 53 | |
| 8 | 33 | |
| 9 | 177 | |
| 10 | 32 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 73 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 36 | |
| 17 | 65 | |
| 18 | 201 | |
| 19 | 86 | |
| 20 | 74 |
About José Manuel Castro‐Lopes
José Manuel Castro‐Lopes is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Pharmacology, having authored 94 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (44 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (19 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (1.6k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.1k citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (316 citations). José Manuel Castro‐Lopes has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Antonio Coimbra, Fani Neto, Luís Filipe Azevedo, Isaura Tavares, Joana Ferreira‐Gomes, Thomas R. Tölle, Sara Adães, Liliane Mendonça, W. Zieglgänsberger and Cláudia Camila Dias. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, The Journal of Comparative Neurology and Stroke.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.