Andre Kehn

1.0k total citations
42 papers, 451 citations indexed

About

Andre Kehn is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Andre Kehn has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 451 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 18 papers in Social Psychology and 15 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Andre Kehn's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (16 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (12 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (9 papers). Andre Kehn is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (16 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (12 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (9 papers). Andre Kehn collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Andre Kehn's co-authors include Joelle C. Ruthig, Robert J. Cramer, Bradlee W. Gamblin, Scott E. Culhane, Kelly Jones, Harmon M. Hosch, John W. Clark, Narina Nuñez, Daniel B. Wright and Matt J. Gray and has published in prestigious journals such as Sex Roles, British Journal of Psychology and Journal of Interpersonal Violence.

In The Last Decade

Andre Kehn

39 papers receiving 436 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Andre Kehn United States	13	243	178	170	101	91	42	451
Katrin Mueller‐Johnson United Kingdom	14	153 0.6×	65 0.4×	151 0.9×	46 0.5×	96 1.1×	33	391
Lora M. Levett United States	10	133 0.5×	100 0.6×	121 0.7×	56 0.6×	49 0.5×	16	321
Ellen Wessel Norway	9	115 0.5×	222 1.2×	152 0.9×	84 0.8×	117 1.3×	10	344
Jennifer J. Ratcliff United States	11	162 0.7×	199 1.1×	59 0.3×	47 0.5×	56 0.6×	22	321
Lavina Y. Ho United States	6	199 0.8×	91 0.5×	243 1.4×	113 1.1×	120 1.3×	10	461
Bryan Myers United States	11	151 0.6×	215 1.2×	125 0.7×	107 1.1×	91 1.0×	30	469
Eric P. Seelau United States	7	164 0.7×	220 1.2×	171 1.0×	161 1.6×	46 0.5×	9	470
Márton Hadarics Hungary	11	332 1.4×	210 1.2×	47 0.3×	101 1.0×	32 0.4×	28	428
Ann E. Tobey United States	5	93 0.4×	354 2.0×	56 0.3×	161 1.6×	261 2.9×	7	545
Heidi M. Gordon Canada	12	118 0.5×	269 1.5×	42 0.2×	250 2.5×	205 2.3×	16	510

Countries citing papers authored by Andre Kehn

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andre Kehn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andre Kehn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andre Kehn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andre Kehn

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andre Kehn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andre Kehn. The network helps show where Andre Kehn may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andre Kehn

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andre Kehn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andre Kehn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andre Kehn. Andre Kehn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Kehn, Andre, et al.. (2025). They may not believe you remembered that nose: juror perceptions of eyewitness’ featural justifications. Current Psychology. 44(6). 4337–4355.

Kehn, Andre, et al.. (2022). Assessing attitudes about hate: Further validation of the hate crime beliefs scale. Current Psychology. 42(29). 25017–25027. 2 indexed citations

Cramer, Robert J., et al.. (2022). A Psychometric Investigation of the Hate-Motivated Behavior Checklist. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 38(7-8). 5638–5660. 2 indexed citations

Cramer, Robert J., et al.. (2021). Development and Psychometric Properties of the Hate-Motivated Behavior Checklist (HMBC). Criminal Justice and Behavior. 48(11). 1652–1673. 2 indexed citations

Gamblin, Bradlee W. & Andre Kehn. (2020). Race salience and attorney statements: the unique role of defense opening statements and closing arguments. Current Psychology. 40(6). 2621–2633. 2 indexed citations

Gamblin, Bradlee W., et al.. (2018). A Comparison of Juror Decision Making in Race-Based and Sexual Orientation–Based Hate Crime Cases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 36(7-8). 3231–3256. 7 indexed citations

Myers, Bryan, et al.. (2018). The heterogeneity of victim impact statements: A content analysis of capital trial sentencing penalty phase transcripts.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 24(4). 474–488. 4 indexed citations

Ruthig, Joelle C., et al.. (2017). Learning From One’s Mistakes. Social Psychology. 48(4). 185–193. 5 indexed citations

Kehn, Andre, et al.. (2015). Attorney beliefs concerning scientific evidence and expert witness credibility. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 41. 58–66. 8 indexed citations

10.

Cramer, Robert J., et al.. (2015). The Impact of Forensic vs. Social-Science Evidence on Judicial Decisions to Grant a Writ of Habeas Corpus. Insecta mundi.

11.

Kehn, Andre, et al.. (2015). Mock Juror Perceptions of Rape Victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 31(17). 2847–2866. 25 indexed citations

12.

Cramer, Robert J., et al.. (2014). A mock juror investigation of blame attribution in the punishment of hate crime perpetrators. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 37(6). 551–557. 14 indexed citations

13.

Myers, Bryan, et al.. (2014). False memories for highly aversive early childhood events: Effects of guided imagery and group influence.. Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice. 1(1). 20–31. 6 indexed citations

14.

Kehn, Andre, et al.. (2014). The German Translation of the Novaco Anger Scale and Provocation Inventory (Ger - NAS-PI). Current Psychology. 34(2). 294–310. 6 indexed citations

15.

Paul, Lisa A., et al.. (2014). Perceptions of, and Assistance Provided to, a Hypothetical Rape Victim: Differences Between Rape Disclosure Recipients and Nonrecipients. Journal of American College Health. 62(6). 426–433. 23 indexed citations

16.

Cramer, Robert J., et al.. (2014). Why the Impact? Negative Affective Change as a Mediator of the Effects of Victim Impact Statements. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 29(16). 2884–2903. 12 indexed citations

17.

Kehn, Andre & Joelle C. Ruthig. (2013). Perceptions of Gender Discrimination across Six Decades: The Moderating Roles of Gender and Age. Sex Roles. 69(5-6). 289–296. 56 indexed citations

18.

Kehn, Andre, et al.. (2012). Determining True and False Witnessed Events: Can an Eyewitness-Implicit Association Test Distinguish Between the Seen and Unseen. Psychiatry Psychology and Law. 20(5). 761–780. 8 indexed citations

19.

Myers, Bryan, et al.. (2011). Victim impact statements and crime heinousness: a test of the saturation hypothesis. Psychology Crime and Law. 19(2). 129–143. 8 indexed citations

20.

Terrance, Cheryl, Amanda L. Thayer, & Andre Kehn. (2006). Undermining Eyewitness Confidence Inflation: Effecting Change Through Expert Testimony. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. 6(1). 73–82. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact