Fadel Tissir

6.2k citations
105 papers · 4.8k · h-index 38

Impact in

Papers in

Fadel Tissir

101 papers receiving 4.8k citations

Peers

Fadel Tissir
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Developmental Neuroscience 1.2k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.8k
  • Cell Biology 1.1k
  • Sensory Systems 182
  • Molecular Biology 2.6k
Replace Kuo-Fen Lee with:
Kuo-Fen Lee United States
Domna Karagogeos Greece
Paola Bovolenta Spain
Jun Aruga Japan
Federico Calegari Germany
Marysia Placzek United Kingdom
Joshua A. Weiner United States
Simon Hippenmeyer Austria
Eva S. Anton United States
Toshio Terashima Japan
Fadel Tissir relative to Kuo-Fen Lee United States Kuo-Fen Lee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
Kuo-Fen Lee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fadel Tissir

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fadel Tissir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fadel Tissir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fadel Tissir more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fadel Tissir

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fadel Tissir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fadel Tissir. The network helps show where Fadel Tissir may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fadel Tissir, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fadel Tissir Line = papers co-authored together Fadel Tissir links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 105 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003637
2 2010282
3 2005209
4 2006171
5 2008148
6 2020147
7 2010146
8 2009125
9 2013125
10 2014118
11 2010112
12 2013107
13 2004102
14 201097
15 200693
16 201482
17 200980
18 201378
19 201276
20 200274

About Fadel Tissir

Fadel Tissir is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cell Biology, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 105 papers that have together received 4.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (32 papers), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (28 papers), Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (20 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (17 papers), Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ (12 papers), Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (11 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers) and Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (1.2k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.8k citations), Cell Biology (1.1k citations), Sensory Systems (182 citations) and Molecular Biology (2.6k citations). Fadel Tissir has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include André M. Goffinet, Libing Zhou, Yves Jossin, Yibo Qu, Isabelle Bar, Catherine Lambert de Rouvroit, Olivier De Backer, Aurélia Ravni, Gundela Meyer and Mireille Montcouquiol. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Mammalian Genome, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, European Journal of Neuroscience and Nature Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact