Dead Sea Discoveries

415 papers and 623 indexed citations i.

About

The 415 papers published in Dead Sea Discoveries in the last decades have received a total of 623 indexed citations. Papers published in Dead Sea Discoveries usually cover Archeology (342 papers), Religious studies (309 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (179 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeology and Historical Studies (311 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (309 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (163 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Dead Sea Discoveries are John J. Collins, Johann Maier, George J. Brooke, Magen Broshi, Emanuel Tov, Eyal Regev, Matthew Goff, Angela Kim Harkins, Ḥanan Eshel and James C. VanderKam.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Dead Sea Discoveries

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Dead Sea Discoveries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Dead Sea Discoveries.

Countries where authors publish in Dead Sea Discoveries

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Dead Sea Discoveries. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Dead Sea Discoveries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dead Sea Discoveries more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025