Euphrosyne

325 papers and 221 indexed citations

About

The 325 papers published in Euphrosyne in the last decades have received a total of 221 indexed citations. Papers published in Euphrosyne usually cover Anthropology (143 papers), Archeology (88 papers) and History (80 papers) specifically the topics of Classical Antiquity Studies (131 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (39 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (38 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Euphrosyne are Antonio Cortijo Ocaña, Charles Burnett, Barry Taylor, Georg Luck, Neil Adkin, Carlo Santini, John M. Fossey, Alain Moreau, Françesco Della Corte and Dominique Briquel.

In The Last Decade

Euphrosyne

107 papers receiving 139 citations

Fields of papers published in Euphrosyne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Euphrosyne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Euphrosyne.

Countries where authors publish in Euphrosyne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Euphrosyne. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Euphrosyne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Euphrosyne more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026