Eyal Baharad
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 5%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 10%
- Safety Research top 10%
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
- Co-authors
- Shmuel NitzanBenjamin EdenZvika NeemanJacob GoldbergerMoshe KoppelRuth Ben‐YasharDoron Kliger
- Topics
- Game Theory and Voting Systems (17 papers)Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (9 papers)Auction Theory and Applications (8 papers)
- Cited by
- General Decision SciencesGeneral Economics, Econometrics and FinanceEconomics and Econometrics
- Partner nations
- IsraelUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Eyal Baharad
20 papers receiving 276 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Economics and Econometrics 223
- Management Science and Operations Research 89
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 73
- Safety Research 59
- General Decision Sciences 49
Countries citing papers authored by Eyal Baharad
This map shows the geographic impact of Eyal Baharad's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eyal Baharad with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eyal Baharad more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eyal Baharad
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eyal Baharad. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eyal Baharad. The network helps show where Eyal Baharad may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eyal Baharad
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eyal Baharad. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eyal Baharad based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eyal Baharad. Eyal Baharad is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 45 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 83 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 33 | |
| 19 | Extended Preferences and Freedom of Choice | 0 |
| 20 | 10 |
About Eyal Baharad
Eyal Baharad is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Economics and Econometrics and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 23 papers that have together received 291 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Voting Systems (17 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (9 papers) and Auction Theory and Applications (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (49 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (73 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (223 citations). Eyal Baharad has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Shmuel Nitzan, Benjamin Eden, Zvika Neeman, Jacob Goldberger, Moshe Koppel, Ruth Ben‐Yashar and Doron Kliger. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic Journal, American Political Science Review and Public Choice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.