Ewa Pięta

41 papers receiving 419 citations

Peers

Ewa Pięta
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Biophysics 90
  • Conservation 32
  • Archeology 63
  • Earth-Surface Processes 34
  • Archeology 5
Replace José Cárcamo with:
José Cárcamo Chile
I. T. Shadi United Kingdom
E. Clavijo Chile
Alessa A. Gambardella United States
Freddy Célis Chile
María Rosa López‐Ramírez Spain
Eduardo López‐Tobar Spain
Richard Van Duyne United States
Diana Cristina Rambaldi Italy
Anna Cesaratto United States
Ewa Pięta relative to José Cárcamo Chile José Cárcamo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
José Cárcamo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ewa Pięta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ewa Pięta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ewa Pięta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ewa Pięta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ewa Pięta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ewa Pięta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ewa Pięta. The network helps show where Ewa Pięta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ewa Pięta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ewa Pięta Line = papers co-authored together Ewa Pięta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202030
2 201920
3 202018
4 202016
5 202116
6 201716
7 201816
8 202116
9 201516
10 201816
11 201415
12 201714
13 201814
14 201414
15 202214
16 202014
17 201413
18 201713
19 202011
20 201411

About Ewa Pięta

Ewa Pięta is a scholar working on Biophysics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry and Archeology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (12 papers), Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (11 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (6 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (4 papers), Building materials and conservation (4 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (4 papers), Conservation Techniques and Studies (4 papers) and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (90 citations), Conservation (32 citations), Archeology (63 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (34 citations) and Archeology (5 citations). Ewa Pięta has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, South Korea and United States. Frequent co-authors include Czesława Paluszkiewicz, Wojciech M. Kwiatek, Natalia Piergies, Leonard M. Proniewicz, Younkyoo Kim, Helena Domin, Tomasz P. Wróbel, Katarzyna Pogoda, Wojciech Ścierski and Magdalena Oćwieja. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Surface Science, Spectrochimica Acta Part A Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease and The Journal of Physical Chemistry A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact