Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Elasticity of normal and cancerous human bladder cells studied by scanning force microscopy
1999567 citationsMałgorzata Lekka, Piotr Laidler et al.European Biophysics Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Janusz Lekki's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janusz Lekki with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janusz Lekki more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janusz Lekki. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janusz Lekki. The network helps show where Janusz Lekki may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janusz Lekki
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janusz Lekki.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janusz Lekki based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Janusz Lekki. Janusz Lekki is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wachulak, P., Andrzej Bartnik, Luděk Vyšín, et al.. (2014). Development of a Laboratory Laser-Produced Plasma “Water Window” X-Ray Source for Radiobiology Experiments. 1(11).
Lekki, Janusz, et al.. (2009). Design of the Krakow X-ray microprobe facility for targeted X-ray irradiations of biological objects. Journal of Radiation Research. 50.1 indexed citations
Lekki, Janusz, et al.. (2003). Testing the efficiency of the Si3N4 membrances for charged particles registration. Nukleonika. 48(1). 25–29.1 indexed citations
Lekka, Małgorzata, Piotr Laidler, Dorota Gil, et al.. (1999). Elasticity of normal and cancerous human bladder cells studied by scanning force microscopy. European Biophysics Journal. 28(4). 312–316.567 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Lekki, Janusz. (1997). Flotometryczna ocena flotowalności naturalnej, bezkolektorowej oraz ksantogenianowej minerałów siarczkowych (in Polish). Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing. 31(1). 175–196.4 indexed citations
18.
Lekki, Janusz. (1990). Thermodynamic analysis of surface compounds in Eh-pH diagrams for PbS-KXEt and Cu2S-KXEt systems. Próba termodynamicznego opisu związków powierzchniowych na diagramie Eh-pH (układ PbS-KXEt oraz Cu2S-KXEt) (in Polish). Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing. 22(1). 89–99.1 indexed citations
19.
Lekki, Janusz. (1989). Spectrophotometric (IR ATR) and electrokinetic studies on aqueous suspensions of ferric ethyl xanthate. Spektralne (IR ATR) i dzetametryczne badania wodnych zawiesin etylowego ksantogenianu żelaza (in Polish). Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing. 21(1). 115–125.1 indexed citations
20.
Lekki, Janusz & Tomasz Chmielewski. (1988). The formation of dixanthogen on the surface of galena of different origin. Powstawanie dwuksantogenianu na powierzchni galeny różnego pochodzenia (in Polish). Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing. 20(1). 115–124.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.