E. Clavijo

21 papers receiving 451 citations

Peers

E. Clavijo
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Biophysics 88
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 179
  • Conservation 25
  • Archeology 49
  • Analytical Chemistry 46
Replace Ewa Pięta with:
Ewa Pięta Poland
José Cárcamo Chile
Stuart Read Canada
Freddy Célis Chile
Alessa A. Gambardella United States
Diana Cristina Rambaldi Italy
Viviana Mollica Nardo Italy
K.P. Ghiggino Australia
C. Garrido Chile
C.H. Nicholls Australia
E. Clavijo relative to Ewa Pięta Poland Ewa Pięta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Ewa Pięta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Clavijo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Clavijo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Clavijo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Clavijo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Clavijo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Clavijo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Clavijo. The network helps show where E. Clavijo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Clavijo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Clavijo Line = papers co-authored together E. Clavijo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200873
2 201064
3 200846
4 200740
5 201133
6 201332
7 201026
8 200819
9 201218
10 200516
11 201115
12 201113
13 198312
14 201011
15 201311
16 20148
17 19997
18 20146
19 20175
20 19994

About E. Clavijo

E. Clavijo is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Molecular Biology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Archeology and Earth-Surface Processes, having authored 21 papers that have together received 460 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (8 papers), Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis (7 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (5 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (5 papers), Building materials and conservation (4 papers), Conservation Techniques and Studies (3 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (2 papers) and Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (88 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (179 citations), Conservation (25 citations), Archeology (49 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (46 citations). E. Clavijo has collaborated with scholars based in Chile, Spain and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include M. Campos‐Vallette, Juan S. Gómez-Jeria, Álvaro Aliaga, C. Garrido, Patricio Leyton, José Cárcamo, Santiago Sánchez‐Cortés, Igor Osorio‐Román, Ricardo F. Aroca and Freddy Célis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, Spectrochimica Acta Part A Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, Biopolymers, International Journal of Polymer Analysis and Characterization and Vibrational Spectroscopy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact