Evert Van den Broeck
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Information Systems and Management top 2%
- Marketing top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Karolien PoelsMichel WalraveBrahim ZaroualiMarjolijn L. AntheunisGuda van NoortHeidi VandeboschKathleen Van Royen
- Topics
- Digital Marketing and Social Media (6 papers)Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (4 papers)Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (4 papers)
- Journals
- Computers in Human BehaviorAmerican Behavioral ScientistCyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking
- Partner nations
- BelgiumNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Evert Van den Broeck
8 papers receiving 546 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Sociology and Political Science 416
- Artificial Intelligence 258
- Information Systems and Management 185
- Marketing 152
- Social Psychology 57
Countries citing papers authored by Evert Van den Broeck
This map shows the geographic impact of Evert Van den Broeck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evert Van den Broeck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evert Van den Broeck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Evert Van den Broeck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Evert Van den Broeck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Evert Van den Broeck. The network helps show where Evert Van den Broeck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Evert Van den Broeck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Evert Van den Broeck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Evert Van den Broeck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Evert Van den Broeck. Evert Van den Broeck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | |
| 2 | 171 | |
| 3 | 157 | |
| 4 | 44 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 82 | |
| 7 | 65 | |
| 8 | Online perspective-taking as an intervention tool against cyberbullying. | 4 |
About Evert Van den Broeck
Evert Van den Broeck is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Marketing and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 8 papers that have together received 568 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Marketing and Social Media (6 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (4 papers) and Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (185 citations), Marketing (152 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (416 citations). Evert Van den Broeck has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Karolien Poels, Michel Walrave, Brahim Zarouali, Marjolijn L. Antheunis, Guda van Noort, Heidi Vandebosch and Kathleen Van Royen. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, American Behavioral Scientist and Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.