Eva Mosner

531 citations
19 papers · 430 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Eva Mosner

18 papers receiving 421 citations

Peers

Eva Mosner
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 230
  • Ecological Modeling 59
  • Ecology 211
  • Global and Planetary Change 153
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 91
Replace Kate Stokes with:
Kate Stokes Australia
D. A. Beaumont United Kingdom
Jesse E. Gray United States
Benjamín Komac Spain
Lauren E. Baur United States
Gábor Ónodi Hungary
Jake J. Grossman United States
Michal Wiezik Slovakia
Aaryn D. Olsson United States
Rafael L. Assis Brazil
Eva Mosner relative to Kate Stokes Australia Kate Stokes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Kate Stokes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Mosner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Mosner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Mosner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Mosner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Mosner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Mosner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Mosner. The network helps show where Eva Mosner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eva Mosner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Mosner Line = papers co-authored together Eva Mosner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201184
2 200768
3 201537
4 201433
5 201232
6 201031
7 201127
8 201121
9 201221
10
Soil vs. canopy seed storage and plant species coexistence in species-rich Australian shrublands (Ecology (September 2007) 88:9 (2292-2304))
200718
11 201517
12 201512
13 201411
14 20187
15 20147
16 20172
17 20231
18 20121
19 20250

About Eva Mosner

Eva Mosner is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 430 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (9 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (5 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (4 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (3 papers), Plant and animal studies (3 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (3 papers), Bioenergy crop production and management (3 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (230 citations), Ecological Modeling (59 citations), Ecology (211 citations), Global and Planetary Change (153 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (91 citations). Eva Mosner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Ilona Leyer, Florian Jeltsch, Niels Blaum, Monika Schwager, Neal J. Enright, Ben P. Miller, Byron B. Lamont, Nancy Collins Johnson, Tobias W. Donath and Kristin Ludewig. Their work appears in journals such as Plant Biology, Biodiversity and Conservation, Conservation Genetics, Applied Vegetation Science and Ecological Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact