Mathias Scholz

1.1k total citations
42 papers, 722 citations indexed

About

Mathias Scholz is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Soil Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mathias Scholz has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 722 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Ecology, 11 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 11 papers in Soil Science. Recurrent topics in Mathias Scholz's work include Soil erosion and sediment transport (11 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (11 papers) and Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (9 papers). Mathias Scholz is often cited by papers focused on Soil erosion and sediment transport (11 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (11 papers) and Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (9 papers). Mathias Scholz collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United Kingdom. Mathias Scholz's co-authors include Frank Dziock, Francis Foeckler, Klaus Henle, Núria Cid, Szabolcs Lengyel, Jörg Freyhof, Danijela Markovic, Savrina F. Carrizo, William Darwall and Michael Gerisch and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Ecology and The Science of The Total Environment.

In The Last Decade

Mathias Scholz

38 papers receiving 692 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mathias Scholz Germany 14 391 271 227 116 104 42 722
Daniel Bruno Spain 15 564 1.4× 421 1.6× 257 1.1× 161 1.4× 138 1.3× 28 919
Owen Mountford United Kingdom 8 317 0.8× 206 0.8× 240 1.1× 131 1.1× 122 1.2× 26 633
Guangchun Lei China 19 586 1.5× 238 0.9× 381 1.7× 110 0.9× 119 1.1× 44 1.1k
Hiromune Mitsuhashi Japan 15 402 1.0× 300 1.1× 253 1.1× 75 0.6× 80 0.8× 34 785
Julian Seddon Australia 13 340 0.9× 352 1.3× 282 1.2× 56 0.5× 69 0.7× 23 701
Francis Isselin‐Nondedeu France 16 495 1.3× 221 0.8× 331 1.5× 43 0.4× 105 1.0× 38 818
Edward S. DeKeyser United States 15 444 1.1× 241 0.9× 214 0.9× 93 0.8× 74 0.7× 38 672
María Rosário Fernandes Portugal 14 569 1.5× 251 0.9× 330 1.5× 211 1.8× 273 2.6× 27 957
Kathrin Januschke Germany 12 652 1.7× 404 1.5× 126 0.6× 196 1.7× 156 1.5× 21 832
N. Jane Halliday New Zealand 14 659 1.7× 198 0.7× 389 1.7× 67 0.6× 74 0.7× 19 973

Countries citing papers authored by Mathias Scholz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mathias Scholz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathias Scholz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathias Scholz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mathias Scholz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mathias Scholz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mathias Scholz. The network helps show where Mathias Scholz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mathias Scholz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mathias Scholz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mathias Scholz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mathias Scholz. Mathias Scholz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
3.
Hecht, Christian, Daniel Hering, Kathrin Januschke, et al.. (2025). Effects of floodplain decoupling on taxonomic and functional diversity of terrestrial floodplain organisms. Ecological Indicators. 170. 113106–113106. 4 indexed citations
4.
Januschke, Kathrin, et al.. (2024). Biozönotische Erfolgskontrolle von Renaturierungsmaßnahmen an Gewässerufern und in Auen. Wasser und Abfall. 26(6). 36–41. 1 indexed citations
5.
Schulz‐Zunkel, Christiane, Elmar Fuchs, Peter Horchler, et al.. (2023). Improving an existing proxy-based approach for floodplain denitrification assessment to facilitate decision making on restoration. The Science of The Total Environment. 892. 164727–164727. 3 indexed citations
6.
Szabolcs, Márton, Savrina F. Carrizo, Danijela Markovic, et al.. (2022). Spatial priorities for freshwater biodiversity conservation in light of catchment protection and connectivity in Europe. PLoS ONE. 17(5). e0267801–e0267801. 12 indexed citations
7.
Serra‐Llobet, Anna, Sonja C. Jähnig, Juergen Geist, et al.. (2022). Restoring Rivers and Floodplains for Habitat and Flood Risk Reduction: Experiences in Multi-Benefit Floodplain Management From California and Germany. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 9. 90 indexed citations
9.
Schulz‐Zunkel, Christiane, Martina Baborowski, Frank Krüger, et al.. (2021). Simple modelling for a large-scale assessment of total phosphorus retention in the floodplains of large rivers. Wetlands. 41(6). 5 indexed citations
10.
Fuchs, Elmar, Christian Hecht, Thomas Hein, et al.. (2020). Advancement of the Acetylene Inhibition Technique Using Time Series Analysis on Air-Dried Floodplain Soils to Quantify Denitrification Potential. Geosciences. 10(11). 431–431. 5 indexed citations
11.
Harris, Rebecca M. B., Christine Fischer, Peter Horchler, et al.. (2020). Biological responses to extreme weather events are detectable but difficult to formally attribute to anthropogenic climate change. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 14067–14067. 21 indexed citations
12.
Natho, Stephanie, et al.. (2020). The impact of bioengineering techniques for riverbank protection on ecosystem services of riparian zones. Ecological Engineering. 158. 106040–106040. 34 indexed citations
13.
Fischer, Christine, Christian Damm, Francis Foeckler, et al.. (2019). The “Habitat Provision” Index for Assessing Floodplain Biodiversity and Restoration Potential as an Ecosystem Service—Method and Application. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 7. 10 indexed citations
14.
Foeckler, Francis, Frank Dziock, Christiane Ilg, et al.. (2018). Shifts in mollusc traits following floodplain reconnection: Testing the response of functional diversity components. Freshwater Biology. 63(6). 505–517. 17 indexed citations
15.
Markovic, Danijela, Savrina F. Carrizo, Jörg Freyhof, et al.. (2014). Europe's freshwater biodiversity under climate change: distribution shifts and conservation needs. Diversity and Distributions. 20(9). 1097–1107. 118 indexed citations
16.
Scholz, Mathias, et al.. (2013). Generic adsorption coefficients and natural removal of heavy metals in muddy river water. International Journal of Bioassays. 2(9). 1260–1268. 1 indexed citations
17.
Lautenbach, Sven, Joachim Maes, Mira Kattwinkel, et al.. (2012). Mapping water quality-related ecosystem services: concepts and applications for nitrogen retention and pesticide risk reduction. International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystems Services & Management. 8(1-2). 35–49. 25 indexed citations
18.
Ilg, Christiane, Frank Dziock, Francis Foeckler, et al.. (2008). LONG‐TERM REACTIONS OF PLANTS AND MACROINVERTEBRATES TO EXTREME FLOODS IN FLOODPLAIN GRASSLANDS. Ecology. 89(9). 2392–2398. 44 indexed citations
19.
Dziock, Frank, et al.. (2006). Biological Indicator Systems in Floodplains – a Review. International Review of Hydrobiology. 91(4). 271–291. 62 indexed citations
20.
Scholz, Mathias, et al.. (1981). Water Turbidity Measurements in Gulf St Vincent.. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026