Eva Moreno‐Bella

469 citations
16 papers · 130 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • Social and Intergroup Psychology 8
    • Migration, Refugees, and Integration 2
    • Cultural Differences and Values 5
    • Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion 1
    • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction 1

Eva Moreno‐Bella

15 papers receiving 126 citations

Peers

Eva Moreno‐Bella
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Social Psychology 53
  • Gender Studies 18
  • Sociology and Political Science 70
  • Applied Psychology 7
  • General Decision Sciences 2
Replace Mirjana Rupar with:
Mirjana Rupar Czechia
Renata Franc Croatia
Mirona Gheorghiu United Kingdom
Mihaela Boza Romania
Léïla Eisner Switzerland
Michael R. Langlais United States
Naumana Amjad Pakistan
Anup Gampa United States
Karl-Heinz Arnold Germany
Tatyana V. Avdeyeva United States
Eva Moreno‐Bella relative to Mirjana Rupar Czechia Mirjana Rupar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mirjana Rupar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Moreno‐Bella

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Moreno‐Bella's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Moreno‐Bella with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Moreno‐Bella more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Moreno‐Bella

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Moreno‐Bella. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Moreno‐Bella. The network helps show where Eva Moreno‐Bella may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Eva Moreno‐Bella, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Moreno‐Bella Line = papers co-authored together Eva Moreno‐Bella links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201925
2 202323
3 202019
4 202212
5 202211
6 20249
7 20228
8 20226
9 20216
10 20234
11 20212
12 20212
13 20241
14 20231
15 20231
16 20240

About Eva Moreno‐Bella

Eva Moreno‐Bella is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Gender Studies, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 130 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (5 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (2 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (2 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (1 paper) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (53 citations), Gender Studies (18 citations), Sociology and Political Science (70 citations), Applied Psychology (7 citations) and General Decision Sciences (2 citations). Eva Moreno‐Bella has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Guillermo B. Willis, Miguel Moya, Mario Sainz, Ángel Sánchez‐Rodríguez, María Alonso-Ferres, Ginés Navarro‐Carrillo, Inmaculada Valor‐Segura, Islam Borinca, Orla T. Muldoon and Clara Kulich. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Psychology, The Journal of Social Psychology, Psicothema and Social Indicators Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact