Dagmar Versmissen
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Philosophy top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Lydia KrabbendamJim van OsInez Myin‐GermeysI. JanssenRon MengelersSusan van HoorenJoost á CampoTineke Lataster
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers)Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Dagmar Versmissen
11 papers receiving 732 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Psychiatry and Mental health 570
- Clinical Psychology 296
- Philosophy 281
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 226
- Cognitive Neuroscience 150
Countries citing papers authored by Dagmar Versmissen
This map shows the geographic impact of Dagmar Versmissen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dagmar Versmissen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dagmar Versmissen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dagmar Versmissen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dagmar Versmissen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dagmar Versmissen. The network helps show where Dagmar Versmissen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dagmar Versmissen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dagmar Versmissen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dagmar Versmissen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dagmar Versmissen. Dagmar Versmissen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | Wanen: over de oorsprong van opmerkelijke opvattingen | 0 |
| 3 | Zzzip²: onderzoek naar de levenskwaliteit van Vlaamse holebi's | 5 |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 165 | |
| 6 | 127 | |
| 7 | 116 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 59 | |
| 12 | 62 | |
| 13 | 144 |
About Dagmar Versmissen
Dagmar Versmissen is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 744 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (570 citations), Philosophy (281 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (226 citations). Dagmar Versmissen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lydia Krabbendam, Jim van Os, Inez Myin‐Germeys, I. Janssen, Ron Mengelers, Susan van Hooren, Joost á Campo, Tineke Lataster, M. Lardinois and Machteld Marcelis. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.