Eugène Zaleski
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
- Demography
- Co-authors
- Julian M. CooperSvetozar PejovichR. W. DaviesE. H. CarrJohn H. MooreJ. H. MooreCharles H. FeinsteinStephen G. Wheatcroft
- Topics
- French Historical and Cultural Studies (3 papers)Soviet and Russian History (3 papers)Urbanization and City Planning (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Eugène Zaleski
13 papers receiving 148 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Political Science and International Relations 128
- Sociology and Political Science 62
- Economics and Econometrics 55
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 14
- Demography 9
Countries citing papers authored by Eugène Zaleski
This map shows the geographic impact of Eugène Zaleski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eugène Zaleski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eugène Zaleski more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eugène Zaleski
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eugène Zaleski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eugène Zaleski. The network helps show where Eugène Zaleski may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eugène Zaleski
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eugène Zaleski. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eugène Zaleski based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eugène Zaleski. Eugène Zaleski is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kenneth R. Timmerman. La grande fauche. La fuite des technologies vers l'Est | 1 |
| 2 | La planification Stalinienne ; croissance et fluctuations économiques en U.R.S.S. 1933-1952 | 3 |
| 3 | 58 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | Technology Transfer Between East and West | 13 |
| 6 | 56 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | Planning for economic growth in the Soviet Union, 1918-1932 | 25 |
| 10 | Science policy in the USSR | 17 |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | Planification de la croissance et fluctuations économiques en U.R.S.S. | 1 |
| 14 | David Granick, Management of the Industrial Firm in the USSR | 2 |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2 |
About Eugène Zaleski
Eugène Zaleski is a scholar working on Urban Studies, History and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 16 papers that have together received 196 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include French Historical and Cultural Studies (3 papers), Soviet and Russian History (3 papers) and Urbanization and City Planning (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (128 citations), Economics and Econometrics (55 citations) and Development (6 citations). Eugène Zaleski has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Julian M. Cooper, Svetozar Pejovich, R. W. Davies, E. H. Carr, John H. Moore, J. H. Moore, Charles H. Feinstein, Stephen G. Wheatcroft, G. Warren Nutter and Domenico Mario Nuti. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic Journal, Southern Economic Journal and The Economic History Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.