Eugene M. Fluder
- Molecular Biology
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 2%
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Materials Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Robert P. SheridanSimon K. KearsleyPeter GundH. Bernhard SchlegelSuresh B. SinghJoseph D. AndoseRalph T. MosleyJose R. De la Vega
- Topics
- Computational Drug Discovery Methods (7 papers)Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers)Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of the American Chemical SocietyAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Eugene M. Fluder
16 papers receiving 770 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Molecular Biology 398
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 317
- Organic Chemistry 197
- Spectroscopy 127
- Materials Chemistry 124
Countries citing papers authored by Eugene M. Fluder
This map shows the geographic impact of Eugene M. Fluder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eugene M. Fluder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eugene M. Fluder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eugene M. Fluder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eugene M. Fluder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eugene M. Fluder. The network helps show where Eugene M. Fluder may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eugene M. Fluder
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eugene M. Fluder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eugene M. Fluder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eugene M. Fluder. Eugene M. Fluder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 101 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 195 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 205 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 172 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 36 | |
| 16 | 8 |
About Eugene M. Fluder
Eugene M. Fluder is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Spectroscopy and Molecular Biology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 812 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (7 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (317 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (96 citations) and Spectroscopy (127 citations). Eugene M. Fluder has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Robert P. Sheridan, Simon K. Kearsley, Peter Gund, H. Bernhard Schlegel, Suresh B. Singh, Joseph D. Andose, Ralph T. Mosley, Jose R. De la Vega, Manuel A. Navia and Brian M. McKeever. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.