Esmée M Bordewijk
- Health Informatics top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education 4
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Ovarian function and disorders 8
- Reproductive Health and Technologies 3
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews 2
-
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility 5
- Ethics in Clinical Research 3
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
-
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy 4
-
- Academic integrity and plagiarism 3
- Co-authors
- Ben W. MolMadelon van WelyWentao LiLyle C. GurrinJim ThorntonFulco van der VeenRui WangRik van Eekelen
- Journals
- Human Reproduction (3 papers)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2 papers)Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Esmée M Bordewijk
14 papers receiving 312 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Health Informatics 45
- Reproductive Medicine 132
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 55
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 190
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 50
Countries citing papers authored by Esmée M Bordewijk
This map shows the geographic impact of Esmée M Bordewijk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Esmée M Bordewijk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Esmée M Bordewijk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Esmée M Bordewijk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Esmée M Bordewijk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Esmée M Bordewijk. The network helps show where Esmée M Bordewijk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Esmée M Bordewijk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 14 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 53 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 33 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 35 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 55 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 20 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 40 |
About Esmée M Bordewijk
Esmée M Bordewijk is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Reproductive Medicine and Safety Research, having authored 15 papers that have together received 321 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian function and disorders (8 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (5 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (4 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (4 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers), Academic integrity and plagiarism (3 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (3 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (45 citations), Reproductive Medicine (132 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (55 citations). Esmée M Bordewijk has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ben W. Mol, Madelon van Wely, Wentao Li, Lyle C. Gurrin, Jim Thornton, Fulco van der Veen, Rui Wang, Rik van Eekelen, Tineke J Crawford and Julie Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Human Reproduction, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology and Fertility and Sterility.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.