Erwin Hofman

1.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
23 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Erwin Hofman is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation and Management Science and Operations Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Erwin Hofman has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Strategy and Management, 9 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation and 5 papers in Management Science and Operations Research. Recurrent topics in Erwin Hofman's work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (8 papers), Product Development and Customization (4 papers) and Business Strategy and Innovation (3 papers). Erwin Hofman is often cited by papers focused on Innovation and Knowledge Management (8 papers), Product Development and Customization (4 papers) and Business Strategy and Innovation (3 papers). Erwin Hofman collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Belgium. Erwin Hofman's co-authors include Johannes I.M. Halman, Wytze van der Gaast, Roberto Rinaldi, Sotiris Papadelis, Martin Hirschnitz-Garbers, Corrado Topi, Alexandros Flamos, Arno Behrens, Αναστασία Ιωάννου and Vasileios Rizos and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Cleaner Production, Research Policy and Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

In The Last Decade

Erwin Hofman

22 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

Implementation of Circular Economy Business Models by Sma... 2016 2026 2019 2022 2016 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Erwin Hofman Netherlands 13 874 493 224 206 173 23 1.3k
Corrado Topi United Kingdom 9 870 1.0× 562 1.1× 281 1.3× 203 1.0× 108 0.6× 14 1.3k
Brian Baldassarre Netherlands 12 877 1.0× 566 1.1× 296 1.3× 196 1.0× 149 0.9× 20 1.3k
Alexandre Joyce Germany 3 886 1.0× 676 1.4× 228 1.0× 260 1.3× 170 1.0× 5 1.4k
Maria Antikainen Finland 13 870 1.0× 488 1.0× 276 1.2× 174 0.8× 185 1.1× 38 1.4k
Thayla Zomer Brazil 13 582 0.7× 394 0.8× 253 1.1× 127 0.6× 200 1.2× 40 1.0k
Raymond L. Paquin Canada 11 1.2k 1.4× 726 1.5× 501 2.2× 245 1.2× 253 1.5× 15 1.9k
Paula De Camargo Fiorini Brazil 16 1.0k 1.2× 534 1.1× 340 1.5× 141 0.7× 129 0.7× 28 1.5k
Andreas Feldmann Sweden 15 1.3k 1.5× 602 1.2× 322 1.4× 167 0.8× 156 0.9× 48 1.8k
Lara Bartocci Liboni Brazil 19 968 1.1× 695 1.4× 295 1.3× 165 0.8× 145 0.8× 60 1.8k
Carlos Montalvo Netherlands 9 720 0.8× 594 1.2× 109 0.5× 174 0.8× 137 0.8× 24 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Erwin Hofman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erwin Hofman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erwin Hofman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erwin Hofman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erwin Hofman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erwin Hofman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erwin Hofman. The network helps show where Erwin Hofman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erwin Hofman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erwin Hofman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erwin Hofman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Erwin Hofman. Erwin Hofman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hofman, Erwin, et al.. (2021). Roadmapping: (Missed) opportunities to overcome strategic challenges. Business Horizons. 64(4). 501–512. 12 indexed citations
2.
Halman, Johannes I.M., et al.. (2020). Getting innovations adopted in the housing sector. Construction Innovation. 20(2). 285–318. 17 indexed citations
3.
Schiele, Holger, et al.. (2020). WHY AND HOW TO INVOLVE PURCHASING IN NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT?. International Journal of Innovation Management. 25(3). 2150027–2150027. 11 indexed citations
4.
Halman, Johannes I.M., et al.. (2019). The continued adoption of housing systems in the Netherlands: A multiple case study. University of Twente Research Information. 2(4). 167–190. 6 indexed citations
5.
Hofman, Erwin & Wytze van der Gaast. (2018). Enhancing ambition levels in nationally determined contributions—Learning from Technology Needs Assessments. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Energy and Environment. 8(1). 7 indexed citations
6.
Hofman, Erwin, et al.. (2018). A bibliometric review of the innovation adoption literature. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 134. 1–21. 211 indexed citations
7.
Hofman, Erwin, Dries Faems, & Stephanie Christine Schleimer. (2017). Governing Collaborative New Product Development: Toward a Configurational Perspective on the Role of Contracts. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 34(6). 739–756. 30 indexed citations
8.
Hofman, Erwin, et al.. (2016). Upscaling Large Scale Deep Renovation in the Dutch Residential Sector: A Case Study. Energy Procedia. 96. 386–403. 17 indexed citations
9.
Hofman, Erwin, et al.. (2016). An assessment method for system innovation and transition (AMSIT)<SUP align="right">1</SUP>. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy. 11(4). 185–185. 5 indexed citations
10.
Rizos, Vasileios, Arno Behrens, Wytze van der Gaast, et al.. (2016). Implementation of Circular Economy Business Models by Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs): Barriers and Enablers. Sustainability. 8(11). 1212–1212. 782 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Schiele, Holger, et al.. (2016). Module Development with Suppliers - Differences between Grey-Box and Black-Box Collaborations. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2016(1). 12584–12584. 1 indexed citations
12.
Hofman, Erwin, Johannes I.M. Halman, & Bart Van Looy. (2016). Do design rules facilitate or complicate architectural innovation in innovation alliance networks?. Research Policy. 45(7). 1436–1448. 27 indexed citations
13.
Halman, Johannes I.M., et al.. (2016). Scenario-Driven Roadmapping to cope with uncertainty: Its application in the construction industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 110. 226–238. 19 indexed citations
14.
Hofman, Erwin, Johannes I.M. Halman, & Michael Song. (2016). When to Use Loose or Tight Alliance Networks for Innovation? Empirical Evidence. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 34(1). 81–100. 27 indexed citations
15.
Hofman, Erwin, et al.. (2015). A Bibliometric Review of the Innovation Adoption Literature. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2015(1). 16847–16847. 5 indexed citations
16.
Hofman, Erwin & Jeroen Meijerink. (2014). Platform thinking for services: the case of human resources. Service Industries Journal. 35(3). 115–132. 14 indexed citations
17.
Hofman, Erwin, et al.. (2011). To share or not to share: that's the question.. University of Twente Research Information. 1 indexed citations
18.
Hofman, Erwin, Hans Voordijk, & Johannes I.M. Halman. (2009). Matching supply networks to a modular product architecture in the house-building industry. Building Research & Information. 37(1). 31–42. 61 indexed citations
19.
Hofman, Erwin, Johannes I.M. Halman, & Hans Voordijk. (2007). Design by sourcing, how to create variety economically. University of Twente Research Information. 1 indexed citations
20.
Hofman, Erwin, et al.. (2006). Variation in Housing Design: Identifying Customer Preferences. Housing Studies. 21(6). 929–943. 51 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026