Erwin H. Ackerknecht
- History top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- General Health Professions
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Roy Harvey PearceGilbert LewisÉtienne EsquirolHeinrich MeyerConstantin von Monakow
- Topics
- Medical History and Research (15 papers)Neurology and Historical Studies (5 papers)Medical History and Innovations (4 papers)
- Cited by
- HistoryGeneral PsychologyNeurology
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandFranceSpain
In The Last Decade
Erwin H. Ackerknecht
47 papers receiving 550 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
- History 152
- Clinical Psychology 117
- Philosophy 86
- General Health Professions 80
- Sociology and Political Science 74
Countries citing papers authored by Erwin H. Ackerknecht
This map shows the geographic impact of Erwin H. Ackerknecht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erwin H. Ackerknecht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erwin H. Ackerknecht more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Erwin H. Ackerknecht
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erwin H. Ackerknecht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erwin H. Ackerknecht. The network helps show where Erwin H. Ackerknecht may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erwin H. Ackerknecht
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erwin H. Ackerknecht. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erwin H. Ackerknecht based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Erwin H. Ackerknecht. Erwin H. Ackerknecht is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | Geschichte der Medizin | 12 |
| 3 | La médecine hospitalière à Paris, 1794-1848 | 9 |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | Rudolf Virchow . Virchow-bibliographie, 1843-1901 | 1 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | Vita mea = Mein Leben | 6 |
| 12 | Von den Geisteskrankheiten | 8 |
| 13 | "Geschichte und Geographie der wichtigsten Krankheiten", Erwin H. Ackerknecht, Stuttgart 1963 : [recenzja] / Jerzy Strojnowski. | 1 |
| 14 | Renaissance der Augenheilkunde 1540-1630 | 1 |
| 15 | Kurze Geschichte der Medizin | 2 |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | Kurze Geschichte der Psychiatrie | 29 |
About Erwin H. Ackerknecht
Erwin H. Ackerknecht is a scholar working on History, General Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 68 papers that have together received 744 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical History and Research (15 papers), Neurology and Historical Studies (5 papers) and Medical History and Innovations (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (152 citations), General Psychology (15 citations) and Neurology (71 citations). Erwin H. Ackerknecht has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, France and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Roy Harvey Pearce, Gilbert Lewis, Étienne Esquirol, Heinrich Meyer and Constantin von Monakow. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Medicine, International Journal of Epidemiology and Political Science Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.