Erwin Dekker

57 papers receiving 252 citations

Peers

Erwin Dekker
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • General Decision Sciences 10
  • Economics and Econometrics 129
  • Urban Studies 25
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 18
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 5
Replace Edward Nik-Khah with:
Edward Nik-Khah United States
Josh Lauer United States
Nicola Giocoli Italy
Martha Poon United States
Tobias Just Germany
Joe Deville United Kingdom
Bradley S. Wimmer United States
Musa Subasi United States
Nicolas Sahuguet Canada
Kyle Bruce Australia
Erwin Dekker relative to Edward Nik-Khah United States Edward Nik-Khah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Edward Nik-Khah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Erwin Dekker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erwin Dekker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erwin Dekker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erwin Dekker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erwin Dekker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erwin Dekker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erwin Dekker. The network helps show where Erwin Dekker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Erwin Dekker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Erwin Dekker Line = papers co-authored together Erwin Dekker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202123
2 202120
3 201619
4 201818
5 201417
6 201617
7 202113
8 202210
9 20188
10 20246
11
Emergent Orders of Worth: Must We Agree on More than a Price?
20176
12 20145
13 20235
14 20145
15 20185
16 20205
17
The social theories of classical political economy and modern economic policy
20164
18 20224
19 20204
20 20164

About Erwin Dekker

Erwin Dekker is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Political Science and International Relations and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 65 papers that have together received 270 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Theory and Institutions (29 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (13 papers), Art History and Market Analysis (10 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (5 papers), Wine Industry and Tourism (5 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers) and Cultural Industries and Urban Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (10 citations), Economics and Econometrics (129 citations), Urban Studies (25 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (18 citations) and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (5 citations). Erwin Dekker has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Kolev, Carl Menger, Marielle de Jong, Arjo Klamer, Jan Tinbergen, Arjen Bogaards, Laurent Taskin and Adrian Beck. Their work appears in journals such as The Review of Austrian Economics, Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, History of Political Economy, Public Choice and Journal of Economic Methodology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact