Ernestina Donkor
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 5%
- Demography top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jane SandallFlorence NaabCollins Atta PokuVictoria BamSarah RominskiJody R. LoriSue Anne BellSamuel A. Obed
- Topics
- Reproductive Health and Technologies (10 papers)Global Maternal and Child Health (8 papers)Family Dynamics and Relationships (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- GhanaNigeriaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ernestina Donkor
22 papers receiving 411 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Reproductive Medicine 227
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 190
- Demography 125
- General Health Professions 93
- Gender Studies 70
Countries citing papers authored by Ernestina Donkor
This map shows the geographic impact of Ernestina Donkor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ernestina Donkor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ernestina Donkor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ernestina Donkor
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ernestina Donkor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ernestina Donkor. The network helps show where Ernestina Donkor may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ernestina Donkor
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ernestina Donkor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ernestina Donkor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ernestina Donkor. Ernestina Donkor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 38 | |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | “Management Gap in the Treatment of Infertility in Ghana”: The Cry of Childless Women | 1 |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 47 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | Socio-cultural perceptions of infertility in Ghana | 11 |
| 20 | 129 |
About Ernestina Donkor
Ernestina Donkor is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Reproductive Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 23 papers that have together received 430 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (10 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (8 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (27 citations), Reproductive Medicine (227 citations) and Demography (125 citations). Ernestina Donkor has collaborated with scholars based in Ghana, Nigeria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jane Sandall, Florence Naab, Collins Atta Poku, Victoria Bam, Sarah Rominski, Jody R. Lori, Sue Anne Bell, Samuel A. Obed, Ernest Maya and Martin Amogre Ayanore. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Social Science & Medicine and BioMed Research International.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.