Erjia Cui

21 papers receiving 108 citations

Peers

Erjia Cui
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Statistics and Probability 20
  • Computational Mathematics 1
  • Transportation 10
  • Biophysics 6
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 12
Replace Erica Tavazzi with:
Erica Tavazzi Italy
Anas El Fathi Canada
Manuel Eichenlaub Germany
Mark Shervey United States
Sarah Keefe United States
Audrey Russell Ireland
Emily S. Lee United States
Luiz Eduardo Barreto Martins Brazil
Maria Giovanna Cuzzoni Italy
Dhivya Srinivasan United States
Erjia Cui relative to Erica Tavazzi Italy Erica Tavazzi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Erica Tavazzi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Erjia Cui

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erjia Cui's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erjia Cui with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erjia Cui more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erjia Cui

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erjia Cui. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erjia Cui. The network helps show where Erjia Cui may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Erjia Cui, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Erjia Cui Line = papers co-authored together Erjia Cui links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202121
2 202021
3 20179
4 20249
5 20236
6 20245
7 20235
8 20254
9 20234
10 20224
11 20213
12 20233
13 20223
14 20213
15 20252
16 20242
17 20242
18 20241
19 20191
20 20241

About Erjia Cui

Erjia Cui is a scholar working on Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Statistics and Probability, having authored 24 papers that have together received 110 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physical Activity and Health (5 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (3 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers), Radiology practices and education (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (2 papers) and Data Visualization and Analytics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (20 citations), Computational Mathematics (1 citation), Transportation (10 citations), Biophysics (6 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (12 citations). Erjia Cui has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and China. Frequent co-authors include Ciprian M. Crainiceanu, Andrew Leroux, Ekaterina Smirnova, Luo Xiao, Feng Chen, Jeff Goldsmith, Xiaowei Chen, Xiqun Chen, Martin A. Lindquist and David Ruppert. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, eLife, Statistics in Medicine and Journal of Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact