Erin Lillie

44.4k total citations · 4 hit papers
44 papers, 4.5k citations indexed

About

Erin Lillie is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. According to data from OpenAlex, Erin Lillie has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 4.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in General Health Professions, 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 7 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. Recurrent topics in Erin Lillie's work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (7 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (5 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers). Erin Lillie is often cited by papers focused on Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (7 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (5 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers). Erin Lillie collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Erin Lillie's co-authors include Andrea C. Tricco, Sharon E. Straus, Wasifa Zarin, Kelly K. O’Brien, Monika Kastner, Heather Colquhoun, Rachel Warren, Jane Pearson Sharpe, Carmen Ng and Charlene Soobiah and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, PLoS ONE and Annals of Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Erin Lillie

44 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Hit Papers

4 papers align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews

2016 1.4k citations Andrea C. Tricco, Erin Lillie et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology profile →
Harassment and Discrimination in Medical Training

2014 456 citations Naif Fnais, Charlene Soobiah et al. Academic Medicine profile →
Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application

2021 418 citations Heather Colquhoun, Tanya Horsley et al. Systematic Reviews profile →
Reporting scoping reviews—PRISMA ScR extension

2020 278 citations Sharon E. Straus, David Moher et al. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Erin Lillie Canada	24	1.2k	790	595	567	544	44	4.5k
Steven V. Owen United States	37	1.4k 1.2×	894 1.1×	930 1.6×	451 0.8×	827 1.5×	97	6.6k
Pandora Pound United Kingdom	31	1.4k 1.2×	660 0.8×	490 0.8×	820 1.4×	429 0.8×	54	5.1k
Lisa Arai United Kingdom	19	1.4k 1.2×	813 1.0×	586 1.0×	325 0.6×	757 1.4×	40	4.0k
Marjorie A. Pett United States	24	954 0.8×	614 0.8×	731 1.2×	373 0.7×	693 1.3×	53	4.5k
David Evans Australia	47	2.0k 1.7×	856 1.1×	1.0k 1.7×	540 1.0×	1.1k 2.1×	159	7.9k
Albine Moser Netherlands	25	1.6k 1.3×	905 1.1×	646 1.1×	395 0.7×	778 1.4×	79	4.9k
Frances Rapport United Kingdom	34	1.8k 1.5×	891 1.1×	493 0.8×	347 0.6×	588 1.1×	190	4.8k
Hilary Thomson United Kingdom	33	2.0k 1.7×	884 1.1×	962 1.6×	264 0.5×	612 1.1×	91	6.5k
Raynard Kington United States	33	1.9k 1.6×	1.5k 1.9×	808 1.4×	275 0.5×	499 0.9×	63	6.7k
Irene Korstjens Netherlands	22	1.1k 1.0×	841 1.1×	640 1.1×	289 0.5×	733 1.3×	36	4.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Erin Lillie

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erin Lillie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erin Lillie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erin Lillie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erin Lillie

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erin Lillie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erin Lillie. The network helps show where Erin Lillie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erin Lillie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erin Lillie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erin Lillie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Erin Lillie. Erin Lillie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Colquhoun, Heather, Tiago S. Jesus, Kelly K. O’Brien, et al.. (2020). Scoping Review on Rehabilitation Scoping Reviews. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 101(8). 1462–1469. 29 indexed citations

Lillie, Erin, et al.. (2020). Response to Letter to the Editor: The impact of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for closed surgical incision on surgical site infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery. 169(5). 1259–1259. 3 indexed citations

Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, Jesmin Antony, Sharon E. Straus, et al.. (2018). Comparative safety and effectiveness of perinatal antiretroviral therapies for HIV-infected women and their children: Systematic review and network meta-analysis including different study designs. PLoS ONE. 13(6). e0198447–e0198447. 18 indexed citations

Tricco, Andrea C., Wasifa Zarin, Erin Lillie, et al.. (2018). Utility of social media and crowd-intelligence data for pharmacovigilance: a scoping review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 18(1). 38–38. 50 indexed citations

Tricco, Andrea C., Wasifa Zarin, Marco Ghassemi, et al.. (2017). Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 96. 133–142. 77 indexed citations

Colquhoun, Heather, Tiago S. Jesus, Kelly K. O’Brien, et al.. (2017). Study protocol for a scoping review on rehabilitation scoping reviews. Clinical Rehabilitation. 31(9). 1249–1256. 40 indexed citations

Tricco, Andrea C., Wasifa Zarin, Erin Lillie, Ba’ Pham, & Sharon E. Straus. (2017). Utility of social media and crowd-sourced data for pharmacovigilance: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 7(1). e013474–e013474. 22 indexed citations

Tricco, Andrea C., Erin Lillie, Wasifa Zarin, et al.. (2016). A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 16(1). 15–15. 1443 indexed citations breakdown →

Tricco, Andrea C., Jesmin Antony, Charlene Soobiah, et al.. (2016). Knowledge synthesis methods for integrating qualitative and quantitative data: a scoping review reveals poor operationalization of the methodological steps. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 73. 29–35. 52 indexed citations

10.

Tricco, Andrea C., Erik Blondal, Areti Angeliki Veroniki, et al.. (2016). Comparative safety and effectiveness of serotonin receptor antagonists in patients undergoing chemotherapy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Medicine. 14(1). 216–216. 35 indexed citations

11.

Elliott, Meghan J., Sharon E. Straus, Neesh Pannu, et al.. (2016). A randomized controlled trial comparing in-person and wiki-inspired nominal group techniques for engaging stakeholders in chronic kidney disease research prioritization. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 16(1). 113–113. 9 indexed citations

12.

Fnais, Naif, Charlene Soobiah, Erin Lillie, et al.. (2014). Harassment and Discrimination in Medical Training. Academic Medicine. 89(5). 817–827. 456 indexed citations breakdown →

13.

Manns, Braden, et al.. (2014). Setting Research Priorities for Patients on or Nearing Dialysis. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 9(10). 1813–1821. 217 indexed citations

14.

Tricco, Andrea C., Charlene Soobiah, Erin Lillie, et al.. (2012). Use of cognitive enhancers for mild cognitive impairment: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Systematic Reviews. 1(1). 25–25. 21 indexed citations

15.

Kastner, Monika, Andrea C. Tricco, Charlene Soobiah, et al.. (2012). What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 12(1). 114–114. 256 indexed citations

16.

Charach, Alice, Patricia Carson, Lynda Booker, et al.. (2011). Conclusions and Recommendations for Future Research. 3 indexed citations

17.

Charach, Alice, et al.. (2010). Childhood Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Future Substance Use Disorders: Comparative Meta-Analyses. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 50(1). 9–21. 331 indexed citations

18.

Lillie, Erin. (1962). OBSTETRICAL ASPECTS OF MEGALOBLASTIC ANAEMIA OF PREGNANCY. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 69(5). 736–738. 13 indexed citations

19.

Gatenby, P. B. B., et al.. (1955). ORAL IRON COMPOUNDS. The Lancet. 266(6890). 618–619. 3 indexed citations

20.

Moore, H. C. & Erin Lillie. (1954). The response of megaloblastic anæmia of pregnancy to vitamin B12. Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -). 29(7). 310–312. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact