Andrew M. Parker

153 papers receiving 5.2k citations

Hit Papers

Individual differences in adult decision-making competence.20072026201320192007200400600

Peers

Andrew M. Parker
Comparison fields: 5 of 184
  • Economics and Econometrics 924
  • General Decision Sciences 911
  • Sociology and Political Science 875
  • Accounting 834
  • General Health Professions 744
Replace C. K. Mertz with:
C. K. Mertz United States
Arie Kapteyn United States
Isaac M. Lipkus United States
William M. P. Klein United States
Yaniv Hanoch United Kingdom
Nathan F. Dieckmann United States
Nancy Welch United States
J. van der Pligt Netherlands
Siegwart Lindenberg Netherlands
Arthur van Soest Netherlands
Andrew M. Parker relative to C. K. Mertz United States C. K. Mertz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
C. K. Mertz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew M. Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew M. Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew M. Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew M. Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew M. Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew M. Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew M. Parker. The network helps show where Andrew M. Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew M. Parker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew M. Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew M. Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew M. Parker. Andrew M. Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 0
3 9
4 4
5 2
6 1
7 11
8 7
9 5
10 13
11 40
12 11
13 117
14
Using "roll-up" measures in healthcare quality reports: perspectives of report sponsors and national alliances.
2
15 45
16 11
17 60
18 41
19
Individual differences in adult decision-making competence.breakdown →
607
20 50

About Andrew M. Parker

Andrew M. Parker is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Health, having authored 159 papers that have together received 5.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (24 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (23 papers) and Disaster Management and Resilience (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (911 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (221 citations) and Applied Psychology (702 citations). Andrew M. Parker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Wändi Bruine de Bruin, Baruch Fischhoff, Joanne Yoong, Angela Hung, Eric R. Stone, JoNell Strough, Courtney A. Gidengil, J. Frank Yates, Brian J. Zikmund‐Fisher and Melanie A. Gold. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026