Eric M. White

2.3k total citations
70 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Eric M. White is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Economics and Econometrics and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Eric M. White has authored 70 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 20 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 15 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Eric M. White's work include Forest Management and Policy (23 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (18 papers) and Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (15 papers). Eric M. White is often cited by papers focused on Forest Management and Policy (23 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (18 papers) and Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (15 papers). Eric M. White collaborates with scholars based in United States, Saudi Arabia and Malawi. Eric M. White's co-authors include Ralph J. Alig, Daniel J. Stynes, Thomas A. Spies, Spencer A. Wood, Darius M. Adams, Anita T. Morzillo, John D. Bailey, Susan Charnley, Jeffrey D. Kline and Michelle M. Steen-Adams and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and Energy Policy.

In The Last Decade

Eric M. White

62 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Eric M. White United States 20 723 269 232 212 144 70 1.3k
Jonathan Salerno United States 21 474 0.7× 195 0.7× 113 0.5× 426 2.0× 101 0.7× 60 1.4k
Matthew Grainger Norway 19 180 0.2× 98 0.4× 81 0.3× 327 1.5× 62 0.4× 62 1.2k
Stephen R. Midway United States 17 322 0.4× 90 0.3× 40 0.2× 420 2.0× 51 0.4× 85 1.2k
Carlos Chávez Chile 19 254 0.4× 68 0.3× 378 1.6× 167 0.8× 4 0.0× 99 1.0k
Andrew Seidl United States 19 548 0.8× 243 0.9× 493 2.1× 360 1.7× 79 0.5× 74 1.5k
Prem Raj Neupane Germany 16 464 0.6× 69 0.3× 131 0.6× 328 1.5× 30 0.2× 30 976
Paul Hirsch United States 10 636 0.9× 165 0.6× 212 0.9× 265 1.3× 43 0.3× 19 1.0k
Diego Herrera United States 13 690 1.0× 114 0.4× 362 1.6× 213 1.0× 36 0.3× 30 1.2k
O. Sarobidy Rakotonarivo United Kingdom 17 538 0.7× 107 0.4× 262 1.1× 245 1.2× 74 0.5× 37 1.1k
Michel Masozera United States 14 484 0.7× 390 1.4× 149 0.6× 234 1.1× 173 1.2× 23 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Eric M. White

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric M. White's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric M. White with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric M. White more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric M. White

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric M. White. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric M. White. The network helps show where Eric M. White may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eric M. White

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eric M. White. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eric M. White based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eric M. White. Eric M. White is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wilkins, Emily J., et al.. (2024). Novel data in recreation monitoring—Summary proceedings from interagency workshops in 2019 and 2023. Scientific investigations report. 1 indexed citations
2.
Boley, B. Bynum, et al.. (2023). Fad or Renaissance? Motivational and demographic characteristics of USDA Forest Service recreationists during and after the pandemic. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism. 44. 100700–100700. 3 indexed citations
3.
Wood, Spencer A., et al.. (2020). Next-generation visitation models using social media to estimate recreation on public lands. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 15419–15419. 70 indexed citations
4.
Davis, Emily Jane, et al.. (2019). Collaborative capacity and outcomes from Oregon's Federal Forest Restoration Program. Scholars' Bank (University of Oregon). 2 indexed citations
5.
Davis, Emily Jane, Jesse Abrams, Eric M. White, & Cassandra Moseley. (2018). Current Challenges and Realities For Forest-based Businesses Adjacent to Public Lands in the United States. Journal of rural and community development. 13(1). 125–142. 6 indexed citations
6.
Charnley, Susan, et al.. (2018). Chapter 10: Environmental justice, low-income and minority populations, and forest management in the northwest forest plan area. 966. 809–849. 2 indexed citations
7.
Fisher, David M., et al.. (2018). Recreational use in dispersed public lands measured using social media data and on-site counts. Journal of Environmental Management. 222. 465–474. 84 indexed citations
8.
Charnley, Susan, Thomas A. Spies, Ana M. G. Barros, Eric M. White, & Keith A. Olsen. (2017). Diversity in forest management to reduce wildfire losses: implications for resilience. Ecology and Society. 22(1). 47 indexed citations
9.
Davis, Emily Jane, et al.. (2017). Comparison of USDA Forest Service and Stakeholder Motivations and Experiences in Collaborative Federal Forest Governance in the Western United States. Environmental Management. 60(5). 908–921. 33 indexed citations
10.
Kline, Jeffrey D., Eric M. White, A. Paige Fischer, et al.. (2017). Integrating social science into empirical models of coupled human and natural systems. Ecology and Society. 22(3). 35 indexed citations
11.
White, Eric M., et al.. (2015). Agriculture Afforestation for Carbon Sequestration Under Carbon Markets in the United States: Leakage Behavior from Regional Allowance Programs. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. 38(1). 132–151. 9 indexed citations
12.
Davis, Emily Jane & Eric M. White. (2015). Collaboration and stewardship authority : the Ashland Forest Resiliency project. Scholars' Bank (University of Oregon). 1 indexed citations
13.
Spies, Thomas A., Eric M. White, Jeffrey D. Kline, et al.. (2014). Examining fire-prone forest landscapes as coupled human and natural systems. Ecology and Society. 19(3). 144 indexed citations
14.
Davis, Emily Jane, et al.. (2013). Forest and watershed restoration in Linn County, Oregon : economic impacts, trends, and recommendations. Scholars' Bank (University of Oregon).
15.
Campbell, Robert S., et al.. (2012). Clinical Benefits of a New Multipurpose Disinfecting Solution in Silicone Hydrogel and Soft Contact Lens Users. Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice. 38(2). 93–101. 22 indexed citations
16.
Kline, Jeffrey D., Randall S. Rosenberger, & Eric M. White. (2011). A National Assessment of Physical Activity in US National Forests. Journal of Forestry. 109(6). 343–351. 6 indexed citations
17.
White, Eric M., Ralph J. Alig, & Susan M. Stein. (2010). Socioeconomic Changes and Forestland Development: Commonalities and Distinctions between the Eastern and Western United States. Journal of Forestry. 108(7). 329–337. 5 indexed citations
20.
Potter, J. W., et al.. (2000). Evaluation of the PuriLens contact lens care system: an automatic care system incorporating UV disinfection and hydrodynamic shear cleaning.. PubMed. 26(3). 134–40. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026