Eric M. Moult

3.2k citations
82 papers · 2.5k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Eric M. Moult

81 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Eric M. Moult
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Ophthalmology 2.1k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.9k
  • Biomedical Engineering 594
  • Biophysics 38
  • Surgery 142
Replace Mark J. Rondeau with:
Mark J. Rondeau United States
Anna C. S. Tan Singapore
Martin F. Kraus United States
WooJhon Choi United States
Eduardo A. Novais Brazil
Zhongdi Chu United States
Talisa E. de Carlo United States
Chieh-Li Chen United States
Mehreen Adhi United States
Hitoshi Tabuchi Japan
Eric M. Moult relative to Mark J. Rondeau United States Mark J. Rondeau's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.4×
Mark J. Rondeau · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eric M. Moult

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric M. Moult's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric M. Moult with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric M. Moult more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric M. Moult

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric M. Moult. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric M. Moult. The network helps show where Eric M. Moult may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eric M. Moult, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eric M. Moult Line = papers co-authored together Eric M. Moult links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015242
2 2014197
3 2016168
4 2016155
5 2016125
6 2016114
7 2016110
8 201696
9 201694
10 201678
11 201866
12 201762
13 201859
14 201245
15 202042
16 201841
17 201940
18 201738
19 201937
20 202033

About Eric M. Moult

Eric M. Moult is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 82 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (54 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (45 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (31 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (26 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (11 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (4 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (3 papers) and Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (2.1k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.9k citations), Biomedical Engineering (594 citations), Biophysics (38 citations) and Surgery (142 citations). Eric M. Moult has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include James G. Fujimoto, Nadia K. Waheed, Jay S. Duker, ByungKun Lee, Philip J. Rosenfeld, Caroline R. Baumal, Mehreen Adhi, WooJhon Choi, Vijaysekhar Jayaraman and André J. Witkin. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Retina, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology Retina and Biomedical Optics Express.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact