Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Quantitative Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography of Choroidal Neovascularization in Age-Related Macular Degeneration
2014601 citationsYali Jia, Steven T. Bailey et al.Ophthalmologyprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Potsaid
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Potsaid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Potsaid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Potsaid more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Potsaid
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Potsaid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Potsaid. The network helps show where Benjamin Potsaid may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin Potsaid
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin Potsaid.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin Potsaid based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin Potsaid. Benjamin Potsaid is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lu, Chen D., André J. Witkin, Nadia K. Waheed, et al.. (2016). Ultrahigh Speed Ophthalmic Surgical OCT for Intraoperative OCT Angiography and Widefield Imaging. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 57(12). 466–466.1 indexed citations
John, Demis D., Christopher Burgner, Benjamin Potsaid, et al.. (2015). Wideband Electrically Pumped 1050-nm MEMS-Tunable VCSEL for Ophthalmic Imaging. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology).5 indexed citations
Jia, Yali, Steven T. Bailey, David J. Wilson, et al.. (2014). Quantitative Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography of Choroidal Neovascularization in Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmology. 121(7). 1435–1444.601 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Potsaid, Benjamin, Jonathan Liu, WooJhon Choi, et al.. (2013). VCSEL Laser Technology for Ultrahigh Speed and Extended Depth Range OCT Imaging of the Retina and Anterior Eye. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 54(15). 1491–1491.1 indexed citations
12.
Lu, Chen D., Martin F. Kraus, Ireneusz Grulkowski, et al.. (2013). Handheld High Speed 500 kHz Swept Source OCT Device Using a Micro Scanning Mirror. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 54(15). 1489–1489.3 indexed citations
Grulkowski, Ireneusz, et al.. (2011). Imaging limbal and scleral vasculature using Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology).1 indexed citations
Mayer, Markus A., et al.. (2010). Motion Artifact Correction in OCT Volume Scans Using Image Registration. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 51(13). 4405–4405.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.