Emyr Williams

58 papers receiving 374 citations

Peers

Emyr Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Health 183
  • Geography, Planning and Development 75
  • Social Psychology 145
  • Philosophy 70
  • Sociology and Political Science 210
Replace William James Hoverd with:
William James Hoverd New Zealand
Thích Nhất Hạnh
Otto von Mering United States
Ralph W. Larkin United States
Janet Orchard United Kingdom
Mark A. Kunkel United States
Steen Halling United States
Kathleen D. Noble United States
Katarzyna Skrzypińska Poland
Barbara A. Hawkins United States
Emyr Williams relative to William James Hoverd New Zealand William James Hoverd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
William James Hoverd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emyr Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emyr Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emyr Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emyr Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emyr Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emyr Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emyr Williams. The network helps show where Emyr Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Emyr Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emyr Williams Line = papers co-authored together Emyr Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200852
2 200728
3 200726
4 201025
5 201216
6 201015
7 200814
8 200613
9 201013
10 200912
11 201010
12 201310
13
UCOTA - The Uganda Community Tourism Association: a comparison with NACOBTA.
200110
14 20069
15 20099
16
Rejection of Christianity and Self-Esteem
20108
17
Rural poverty in Wales: Existing research and evidence gaps
20168
18 20098
19 20167
20 20097

About Emyr Williams

Emyr Williams is a scholar working on Health, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Philosophy and Demography, having authored 61 papers that have together received 424 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (31 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (14 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (12 papers), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (10 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (8 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (5 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (4 papers) and Physical Education and Pedagogy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (183 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (75 citations), Social Psychology (145 citations), Philosophy (70 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (210 citations). Emyr Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Leslie J. Francis, Mandy Robbins, Andrew Village, Christopher Alan Lewis, Anna Spenceley, Sergej Flere, Kathryn LaMaster, Janet Goodall, D. P. Burkitt and D. Fontana. Their work appears in journals such as Implicit Religion, Archive for the Psychology of Religion, Journal of Contemporary Religion, Journal of Beliefs and Values and Rural Theology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact