Emma Williams
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Health
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Nkiru NnawuleziMichael RoweSarah CharmanArun SondhiIan HeskethRichard HardingMiranda A. H. HorvathFergal W. Jones
- Topics
- Policing Practices and Perceptions (9 papers)Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (7 papers)Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Emma Williams
18 papers receiving 196 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Sociology and Political Science 131
- Political Science and International Relations 90
- Gender Studies 79
- Health 47
- Clinical Psychology 47
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Williams. The network helps show where Emma Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Williams. Emma Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 46 | |
| 17 | Family Violence Prevention Legal Services: National Evaluation Report | 0 |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Critical issues in rape investigation: an overview of reform in England and Wales | 13 |
About Emma Williams
Emma Williams is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Health and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 25 papers that have together received 211 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (9 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (7 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (79 citations), Health (47 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (90 citations). Emma Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Nkiru Nnawulezi, Michael Rowe, Sarah Charman, Arun Sondhi, Ian Hesketh, Richard Harding, Miranda A. H. Horvath, Fergal W. Jones, David Allison and Penny Lewis. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Physiology, Journal of Family Violence and Criminology & Criminal Justice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.