Emma Williams
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Trevor W. RobbinsBarbara J. SahakianHugh MiddletonRobert D. RogersAdrian M. OwenAdam JoinsonJohn D. PickardA. M. Owen
- Topics
- Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (9 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (9 papers)Spam and Phishing Detection (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Emma Williams
48 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.3k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 348
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 305
- Sociology and Political Science 299
- Clinical Psychology 293
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Williams. The network helps show where Emma Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Williams. Emma Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 121 | |
| 6 | Putting learning into practice: self-reflections from cops | 10 |
| 7 | 97 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 39 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | Measuring the unmeasurable: Evaluations of complex programs in the Northern Territory | 1 |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 67 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 114 | |
| 16 | 62 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 238 | |
| 20 | 20 |
About Emma Williams
Emma Williams is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Health and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 49 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (9 papers) and Spam and Phishing Detection (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (160 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.3k citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (85 citations). Emma Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Trevor W. Robbins, Barbara J. Sahakian, Hugh Middleton, Robert D. Rogers, Adrian M. Owen, Adam Joinson, John D. Pickard, A. M. Owen, Joanne Hinds and T. Adrian Carpenter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and NeuroImage.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.