Emma Whelan

19 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers

Emma Whelan
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Reproductive Medicine 68
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 23
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 29
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 94
  • Gender Studies 26
Replace John Keown with:
John Keown United States
Sharon L. Sims United States
Puja Iyer United States
Jared D. Michonski United States
Lizzie Ward United Kingdom
Karen M. Schmidt United States
Chloe Parton Australia
Patricia R. Owen United States
Deborah Lancastle United Kingdom
Carolyn Finck Colombia
Emma Whelan relative to John Keown United States John Keown's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
John Keown · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Whelan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Whelan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Whelan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Whelan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Whelan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Whelan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Whelan. The network helps show where Emma Whelan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Whelan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Whelan Line = papers co-authored together Emma Whelan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200799
2 200343
3 200336
4 201533
5 201321
6 201119
7 201718
8 200116
9
Venous plethysmography values in patients with spinal cord injury.
198715
10 200912
11 202011
12 20138
13 20216
14
Staging and Profiling: The Constitution of the Endometriotic Subject in Gynecological Discourse
19975
15 20183
16 20182
17
What is your cancer risk?
19771
18 20171
19
Health risks associated with excessive warnings about alleged cancer risks.
19921
20 20230

About Emma Whelan

Emma Whelan is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Education, Sociology and Political Science, Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, having authored 20 papers that have together received 350 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (3 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (3 papers), Education, Leadership, and Health Research (3 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (2 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (1 paper), Higher Education Practises and Engagement (1 paper), Infection Control in Healthcare (1 paper) and Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (68 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (23 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (29 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (94 citations) and Gender Studies (26 citations). Emma Whelan has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mark Asbridge, Angela N. H. Creager, Londa Schiebinger, Elizabeth Lunbeck, Susan Haydt, George Kephart, Karen Mann, Jonathan Tummons, Olga Kits and Anna MacLeod. Their work appears in journals such as Sociology of Health & Illness, The Canadian Journal of Sociology, Journal of Pain, Neuroscience and Human Molecular Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact