Emma R. Toner

902 citations
16 papers · 513 indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 6

Emma R. Toner

12 papers receiving 504 citations

Hit Papers

The network approach to psychopathology: a review of the ...4512019202620212023100200300400

Peers

Emma R. Toner
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Biological Psychiatry 98
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 434
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 229
  • Applied Psychology 47
  • Clinical Psychology 169
Replace Jolanda Kossakowski with:
Jolanda Kossakowski Netherlands
Inés Nieto Spain
Ria H. A. Hoekstra Netherlands
Robin N. Groen Netherlands
Jonathan W. Reeves United States
Regina Espinosa Spain
Annelie Klippel Netherlands
Tim Kaiser Germany
Fionneke M. Bos Netherlands
Lindy‐Lou Boyette Netherlands
Emma R. Toner relative to Jolanda Kossakowski Netherlands Jolanda Kossakowski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Jolanda Kossakowski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma R. Toner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma R. Toner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma R. Toner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma R. Toner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma R. Toner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma R. Toner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma R. Toner. The network helps show where Emma R. Toner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma R. Toner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma R. Toner Line = papers co-authored together Emma R. Toner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20251
4 20240
5 20246
6 20244
7 20241
8 20238
9 20230
10 20233
11 20226
12 20216
13 20201
14 201922
15 20194
16
The network approach to psychopathology: a review of the literature 2008–2018 and an agenda for future researchbreakdown →
2019451

About Emma R. Toner

Emma R. Toner is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 16 papers that have together received 513 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (9 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (2 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers) and Emotion and Mood Recognition (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (98 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (434 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (229 citations). Emma R. Toner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and India. Frequent co-authors include Donald J. Robinaugh, Ria H. A. Hoekstra, Denny Borsboom, Richard J. McNally, Cynthia Moore, Nicole J. LeBlanc, Luana Marques, Emily O’Day, Bethany A. Teachman and Katharine E. Daniel. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, General Psychiatry, Death Studies, Research and theory for nursing practice and Journal of Affective Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026