Research and theory for nursing practice

472 papers and 6.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 472 papers published in Research and theory for nursing practice in the last decades have received a total of 6.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Research and theory for nursing practice usually cover General Health Professions (205 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (95 papers) and Clinical Psychology (88 papers) specifically the topics of Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (35 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (31 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (27 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Research and theory for nursing practice are Alexandra McCarthy, Debra R. Hanna, Marieke J. Schuurmans, Sijmen A. Duursma, Lillie M. Shortridge‐Baggett, Rebecca H. Lehto, Karen Stein, Judith E. Hupcey, Janice Penrod and Denise Saint Arnault.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Research and theory for nursing practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Research and theory for nursing practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Research and theory for nursing practice.

Countries where authors publish in Research and theory for nursing practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Research and theory for nursing practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Research and theory for nursing practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Research and theory for nursing practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025