Emma M. Newton
- Conservation top 0.5%
- Conservation Techniques and Studies 5
- Earth-Surface Processes top 2%
- Building materials and conservation 6
- Archeology top 1%
- Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis 6
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Planetary Science and Exploration 6
-
- Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology 10
- Lichen and fungal ecology 6
-
- Polar Research and Ecology 7
-
- Space Exploration and Technology 2
- Co-authors
- Howell G. M. EdwardsD. D. Wynn‐WilliamsJohn C. RussH. G. M. EdwardsDennis W. FarwellFernando Rull PérezSusana E. Jorge VillarDavid L. Dickensheets
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Emma M. Newton
22 papers receiving 792 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Conservation 192
- Earth-Surface Processes 273
- Archeology 300
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 212
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 250
Countries citing papers authored by Emma M. Newton
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma M. Newton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma M. Newton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma M. Newton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma M. Newton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma M. Newton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma M. Newton. The network helps show where Emma M. Newton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma M. Newton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 63 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 56 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 24 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 84 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 37 | |
| 13 | The role of habitat structure for biomolecule integrity and microbial survival under extreme environmental stress in Antarctica (and Mars?): ecology and technology | 2001 | 11 |
| 14 | 2000 | 80 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 74 | |
| 16 | 2000 | 60 | |
| 17 | 2000 | 115 | |
| 18 | The Detection of Cold Desert Biomarkers, Ancient and Modern: Antarctica and Mars? | 2000 | 4 |
| 19 | 2000 | 6 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 59 |
About Emma M. Newton
Emma M. Newton is a scholar working on Conservation, Earth-Surface Processes and Space and Planetary Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 825 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology (10 papers), Polar Research and Ecology (7 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (6 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (6 papers), Building materials and conservation (6 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (6 papers), Conservation Techniques and Studies (5 papers) and Space Exploration and Technology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (192 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (273 citations) and Archeology (300 citations). Emma M. Newton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Howell G. M. Edwards, D. D. Wynn‐Williams, John C. Russ, H. G. M. Edwards, Dennis W. Farwell, Fernando Rull Pérez, Susana E. Jorge Villar, David L. Dickensheets, Ferrán García‐Pichel and Steven R. Coombes. Their work appears in journals such as Icarus, The Analyst and Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.