Emma Kowal
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Health top 2%
- Education top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Genetics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Yin ParadiesJoanna RadinFiona A. WhiteJessica WaltonNaomi PriestR. DowningRoss BailieMegan Warin
- Topics
- Race, Genetics, and Society (17 papers)Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (16 papers)Ethics in Clinical Research (15 papers)
- Journals
- Nature CommunicationsSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesIreland
In The Last Decade
Emma Kowal
77 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
- Sociology and Political Science 674
- Health 405
- Education 318
- General Health Professions 290
- Genetics 250
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Kowal
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Kowal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Kowal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Kowal more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Kowal
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Kowal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Kowal. The network helps show where Emma Kowal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Kowal
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Kowal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Kowal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Kowal. Emma Kowal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 117 | |
| 15 | Welcome to post-colonial manners in university country | 1 |
| 16 | Welcome to Country | 11 |
| 17 | 52 | |
| 18 | Dust, Distance and Discussion: Fieldwork Experiences from the Housing Improvement and Child Health Study | 7 |
| 19 | 48 | |
| 20 | Breeding for resistance to fleece rot and body strike - the Trangie programme. | 23 |
About Emma Kowal
Emma Kowal is a scholar working on Health, Geography, Planning and Development and Anthropology, having authored 81 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Race, Genetics, and Society (17 papers), Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (16 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (405 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (120 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (115 citations). Emma Kowal has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Yin Paradies, Joanna Radin, Fiona A. White, Jessica Walton, Naomi Priest, R. Downing, Ross Bailie, Megan Warin, Ian Anderson and Jenny Reardon. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.