Hugh Dawkins
- Microbiology top 1%
- Genetics top 2%
- Genomics and Rare Diseases 22
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer 4
- Health Informatics top 5%
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 8
- Virology top 10%
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research 7
-
- Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research 5
- Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies 4
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 5
-
- Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances 5
- Co-authors
- J. M. PapadimitriouGareth BaynamKirsty M. TownsendA. J. FrostCaron MolsterJacqueline M. BentelNikolajs ZepsKatie Meehan
- Journals
- Nucleic Acids Research (1 paper)Nature Communications (1 paper)SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Hugh Dawkins
68 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
- Microbiology 307
- Genetics 931
- Health Informatics 30
- Cancer Research 271
- Virology 68
Countries citing papers authored by Hugh Dawkins
This map shows the geographic impact of Hugh Dawkins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hugh Dawkins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hugh Dawkins more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hugh Dawkins
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hugh Dawkins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hugh Dawkins. The network helps show where Hugh Dawkins may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hugh Dawkins, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 42 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 120 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 43 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 33 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 31 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 23 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 28 | |
| 16 | 1996 | 22 | |
| 17 | 1994 | 18 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 13 | |
| 19 | 1993 | 6 | |
| 20 | 1991 | 17 |
About Hugh Dawkins
Hugh Dawkins is a scholar working on Genetics, Cancer Research and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 69 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Rare Diseases (22 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (8 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (7 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (5 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (4 papers) and Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (307 citations), Genetics (931 citations) and Health Informatics (30 citations). Hugh Dawkins has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include J. M. Papadimitriou, Gareth Baynam, Kirsty M. Townsend, A. J. Frost, Caron Molster, Jacqueline M. Bentel, Nikolajs Zeps, Katie Meehan, Hanns Lochmüller and John W. Holland. Their work appears in journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Nature Communications and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.