Emma J. Palmer
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Co-authors
- Clive R. HollinVincent EganRuth M. HatcherJames McGuireCharlotte BilbyJuliet HounsomeGlynis H. MurphyPeter E. Langdon
- Topics
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (29 papers)Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (22 papers)Crime Patterns and Interventions (21 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPersonality and Individual DifferencesAge and Ageing
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
Emma J. Palmer
61 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Clinical Psychology 1.2k
- Sociology and Political Science 843
- Social Psychology 360
- Cognitive Neuroscience 212
- General Health Professions 144
Countries citing papers authored by Emma J. Palmer
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma J. Palmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma J. Palmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma J. Palmer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma J. Palmer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma J. Palmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma J. Palmer. The network helps show where Emma J. Palmer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma J. Palmer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma J. Palmer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma J. Palmer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma J. Palmer. Emma J. Palmer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 176 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 47 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 35 | |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | Offending Behaviour Programmes: Development, Application and Controversies | 49 |
| 14 | 80 | |
| 15 | 30 | |
| 16 | 37 | |
| 17 | 29 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | Delinquency and Young Offenders | 8 |
| 20 | 8 |
About Emma J. Palmer
Emma J. Palmer is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (29 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (22 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.2k citations), Sociology and Political Science (843 citations) and Social Psychology (360 citations). Emma J. Palmer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Clive R. Hollin, Vincent Egan, Ruth M. Hatcher, James McGuire, Charlotte Bilby, Juliet Hounsome, Glynis H. Murphy, Peter E. Langdon, Laura Caulfield and I. C. H. Clare. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Personality and Individual Differences and Age and Ageing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.