Emma Hamilton

711 citations
23 papers · 501 indexed · h-index 14

Emma Hamilton

22 papers receiving 472 citations

Peers

Emma Hamilton
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Equine 79
  • Microbiology 6
  • Genetics 65
  • Small Animals 32
  • Immunology 80
Replace Cristiane Jaciara Furlaneto with:
Cristiane Jaciara Furlaneto Brazil
Ilana Drucker Israel
Susanne Gjørup Sækmose Denmark
A. J. Bowdler United States
Shuji Ohta Japan
M Fife United Kingdom
Soji YAMAZAKI Japan
Kyriaki Zeibecoglou United Kingdom
F Oberling France
J Grayson United States
Emma Hamilton relative to Cristiane Jaciara Furlaneto Brazil Cristiane Jaciara Furlaneto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.8×
Cristiane Jaciara Furlaneto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Hamilton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Hamilton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Hamilton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Hamilton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Hamilton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Hamilton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Hamilton. The network helps show where Emma Hamilton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Hamilton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Hamilton Line = papers co-authored together Emma Hamilton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20240
3 20234
4 201725
5 20166
6 20165
7 201311
8 201218
9 201125
10 200817
11 200857
12 200820
13 200613
14 200574
15 199416
16
The percentage labelled mitoses technique shows the mean cell cycle time to be half its true value in Carcinoma NT. II. [3H]deoxyuridine studies.
198311
17
The percentage labelled mitoses technique shows the mean cell cycle time to be half its true value in Carcinoma NT. I. [3H]thymidine and vincristine studies.
198311
18 198214
19
In situ measures of tumour cell proliferation and their relation to models of tumour growth.
19801
20 197062

About Emma Hamilton

Emma Hamilton is a scholar working on Equine, Small Animals and Genetics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 501 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Equine Medical Research (4 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (4 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (3 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (2 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (2 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (2 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (2 papers) and Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (79 citations), Microbiology (6 citations) and Genetics (65 citations). Emma Hamilton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include J. P. Lavoie, Stéphane Lajoie-Kadoch, Philippe Joubert, Laurence M. Blendis, Kenneth L. Jones, I. D. Ansell, R Williams, Mary T. Austin, Neil Steven and Hoang Nguyen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Equine Veterinary Journal, British Journal of Haematology, British Journal of Cancer and Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026