Mary T. Austin

3.2k total citations
104 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Mary T. Austin is a scholar working on Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary T. Austin has authored 104 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 56 papers in Surgery, 24 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 23 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Mary T. Austin's work include Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (13 papers), Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (12 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (10 papers). Mary T. Austin is often cited by papers focused on Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (13 papers), Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (12 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (10 papers). Mary T. Austin collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Mary T. Austin's co-authors include Kevin P. Lally, KuoJen Tsao, Emma C. Hamilton, Andrea Hayes‐Jordan, Roshni Dasgupta, Irene D. Feurer, C. Wright Pinson, Charles C. Miller, Cynthia D. Downard and Adam B. Goldin and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PEDIATRICS and Annals of Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Mary T. Austin

90 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mary T. Austin United States 26 1.1k 432 356 300 267 104 2.0k
Timothy B. Lautz United States 26 1.3k 1.2× 527 1.2× 191 0.5× 271 0.9× 214 0.8× 129 2.3k
Juan E. Sola United States 30 1.9k 1.7× 820 1.9× 500 1.4× 429 1.4× 348 1.3× 210 3.3k
Kenneth W. Gow United States 36 1.6k 1.5× 1.1k 2.5× 226 0.6× 496 1.7× 339 1.3× 156 3.4k
Greg Russell United States 24 1.2k 1.1× 630 1.5× 420 1.2× 604 2.0× 129 0.5× 70 2.2k
Seth D. Goldstein United States 24 987 0.9× 386 0.9× 477 1.3× 173 0.6× 155 0.6× 114 1.7k
Thomas J. Miner United States 27 1.1k 1.0× 542 1.3× 289 0.8× 672 2.2× 501 1.9× 101 2.2k
Erin Hall United States 22 633 0.6× 241 0.6× 144 0.4× 288 1.0× 543 2.0× 54 1.7k
Daniel G. Winger United States 25 668 0.6× 286 0.7× 206 0.6× 119 0.4× 151 0.6× 61 1.6k
Annie Fecteau Canada 29 1.9k 1.7× 444 1.0× 98 0.3× 183 0.6× 194 0.7× 86 2.4k
Deborah L. Covington United States 23 491 0.5× 379 0.9× 295 0.8× 235 0.8× 281 1.1× 63 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Mary T. Austin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary T. Austin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary T. Austin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary T. Austin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary T. Austin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary T. Austin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary T. Austin. The network helps show where Mary T. Austin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary T. Austin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary T. Austin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary T. Austin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary T. Austin. Mary T. Austin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mann, Lovepreet K., Nisha Rani Agarwal, Hope Northrup, et al.. (2025). Morphometric analysis of spina bifida after fetal repair shows new subtypes with associated outcomes. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 66(4). 443–452.
3.
Gill, Jonathan, et al.. (2025). The Role of Sociodemographics in Pediatric, Adolescent and Young Adult Osteosarcoma: A Population Based Study. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 60(4). 162202–162202.
4.
Chiang, Yi-Ju, et al.. (2024). An Enhanced Recovery Program for Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Surgical Oncology Patients Improves Outcomes After Surgery. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 60(2). 161912–161912.
5.
Fletcher, Stephen A., et al.. (2024). Fetal cardiovascular changes during open and fetoscopic in‐utero spina bifida closure. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 64(2). 193–202. 2 indexed citations
6.
Papanna, Ramesha, Stephen A. Fletcher, Lovepreet K. Mann, et al.. (2023). Fetoscopic myelomeningocele (fMMC) repair with human umbilical cord (fMMC-HUC) compared with open in-utero MMC repair (oMMC). American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 228(1). S44–S44. 1 indexed citations
7.
Stokes, Sarah C., Christina M. Theodorou, Manisha Bhatia, et al.. (2022). Recognition and management of traumatic fetal injuries. Injury. 53(4). 1329–1344. 3 indexed citations
8.
Bartal, Michal Fishel, KuoJen Tsao, Mary T. Austin, et al.. (2022). Primary vs patch‐based skin closure for in‐utero spina bifida repair. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 60(5). 666–672. 3 indexed citations
9.
Arshad, Seyed A., Elisa I. Garcia, Nutan B. Hebballi, et al.. (2021). Variability in opioid prescribing practices, knowledge, and beliefs: A survey of providers caring for pediatric surgical patients. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 57(3). 469–473.
10.
Bence, Christina M., Rachel M. Landisch, Anikó Szabó, et al.. (2021). Risk factors for perioperative hypothermia and infectious outcomes in gastroschisis patients. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 56(7). 1107–1112. 6 indexed citations
11.
Li, Linda T., Nutan B. Hebballi, E. W. Reynolds, et al.. (2021). Variation in opioid utilization among neonates with gastroschisis. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 56(7). 1113–1116.
13.
Arshad, Seyed A., et al.. (2020). Preoperative Opioids Associated With Increased Postoperative Opioid Use in Pediatric Appendicitis. Journal of Surgical Research. 255. 144–151. 3 indexed citations
14.
Tsao, KuoJen, Mary T. Austin, Stephen A. Fletcher, et al.. (2020). Outcomes after In Utero Myelomeningocele Repair Based on Delivery Location. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 9(11). 3443–3443. 1 indexed citations
15.
Mann, Lovepreet K., Stephen A. Fletcher, Jeannine Garnett, et al.. (2019). Suture techniques and patch materials using an in-vitro model for watertight closure of in-utero spina bifida repair. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 55(4). 726–731. 8 indexed citations
16.
Aldrink, Jennifer H., Stephanie F. Polites, Timothy B. Lautz, et al.. (2019). What’s new in pediatric melanoma: An update from the APSA cancer committee. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 55(9). 1714–1721. 8 indexed citations
17.
Anderson, Kathryn T., Marisa A. Bartz-Kurycki, Robert Martin, et al.. (2018). Let the right one in: High admission rate for low-acuity pediatric burns. Surgery. 165(2). 360–364. 5 indexed citations
18.
Cameron, Danielle B., Regan F. Williams, Yimin Geng, et al.. (2017). Time to appendectomy for acute appendicitis: A systematic review. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 53(3). 396–405. 35 indexed citations
19.
Carpenter, Robert O., Mary T. Austin, John L. Tarpley, Marie R. Griffin, & Kimberly D. Lomis. (2006). Work-hour restrictions as an ethical dilemma for residents. The American Journal of Surgery. 191(4). 527–532. 30 indexed citations
20.
Leys, Charles M., et al.. (2005). Elective intestinal operations in infants and children without mechanical bowel preparation: a pilot study. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 40(6). 978–982. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026