Emma Frew
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
-
- Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet 32
- Economics and Econometrics top 1%
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 32
- Economic and Environmental Valuation 13
- Healthcare Policy and Management 12
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Healthcare cost, quality, practices 10
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
-
- Obesity and Health Practices 18
-
- Physical Activity and Health 8
-
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 7
- Co-authors
- David K. WhynesJane WolstenholmeA. Juarez-GarciaEd DayMartin ConnockA Fry-SmithAmanda BurlsSusan Bayliss
- Cited by
- General Decision SciencesPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthEconomics and Econometrics
- Journals
- The Lancet (1 paper)SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2 papers)PLoS ONE (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Emma Frew
106 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
- General Decision Sciences 55
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 862
- Economics and Econometrics 738
- General Health Professions 590
- Clinical Psychology 455
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Frew
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Frew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Frew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Frew more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Frew
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Frew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Frew. The network helps show where Emma Frew may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Frew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 55 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 21 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 54 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 89 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 441 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 69 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 66 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 29 | |
| 20 | Patient's charter--worth the wait. | 1994 | 1 |
About Emma Frew
Emma Frew is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 112 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (32 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (32 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (18 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (13 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (12 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (10 papers), Physical Activity and Health (8 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (55 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (862 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (738 citations). Emma Frew has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include David K. Whynes, Jane Wolstenholme, A. Juarez-Garcia, Ed Day, Martin Connock, A Fry-Smith, Amanda Burls, Susan Bayliss, Sue Jowett and Tracy Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.