Emma E. Wolters

30 papers receiving 538 citations

Peers

Emma E. Wolters
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 255
  • Physiology 328
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 137
  • Neurology 51
  • Biological Psychiatry 14
Replace Kaitlin N. Swinnerton with:
Kaitlin N. Swinnerton United States
Ping Chiao United States
Amelia Strom United States
Aida Niñerola‐Baizán Spain
Matthew Zammit United States
Veronika Corradini Sweden
Tessa Timmers Netherlands
Mary Ellen Koran United States
Sheelakumari Raghavan India
Daisuke Yanase Japan
Emma E. Wolters relative to Kaitlin N. Swinnerton United States Kaitlin N. Swinnerton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Kaitlin N. Swinnerton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma E. Wolters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma E. Wolters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma E. Wolters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma E. Wolters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma E. Wolters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma E. Wolters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma E. Wolters. The network helps show where Emma E. Wolters may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma E. Wolters, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma E. Wolters Line = papers co-authored together Emma E. Wolters links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202167
2 201935
3 201932
4 202032
5 202030
6 201630
7 202230
8 202129
9 201228
10 201922
11 201821
12 201820
13 202119
14 202219
15 199218
16 202017
17 202214
18 201314
19 202113
20 202013

About Emma E. Wolters

Emma E. Wolters is a scholar working on Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 32 papers that have together received 547 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (14 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (11 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (4 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (3 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (255 citations), Physiology (328 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (137 citations), Neurology (51 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (14 citations). Emma E. Wolters has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rik Ossenkoppele, Bart N.M. van Berckel, Philip Scheltens, Sandeep S.V. Golla, Tessa Timmers, Albert D. Windhorst, Ronald Boellaard, Sander C.J. Verfaillie, Wiesje M. van der Flier and Hayel Tuncel. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Alzheimer s Research & Therapy, Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, NeuroImage Clinical and Molecular Imaging and Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact