Emma Antrobus

38 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

Shaping Citizen Perceptions of Police Legitimacy: A Rando...20132026201720212013100200300400500

Peers

Emma Antrobus
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Sociology and Political Science 990
  • Political Science and International Relations 889
  • Gender Studies 165
  • Education 162
  • Health 150
Replace Jeff Rojek with:
Jeff Rojek United States
Rick Trinkner United States
Devon Johnson United States
Tracey L. Meares United States
Elise Sargeant Australia
Kyle McLean United States
Allison T. Chappell United States
Scott W. Phillips United States
Elizabeth Eggins Australia
Kim Michelle Lersch United States
Emma Antrobus relative to Jeff Rojek United States Jeff Rojek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Jeff Rojek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Antrobus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Antrobus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Antrobus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Antrobus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Antrobus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Antrobus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Antrobus. The network helps show where Emma Antrobus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Antrobus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Antrobus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Antrobus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Antrobus. Emma Antrobus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 5
2 3
3 10
4 0
5 6
6 15
7
Evidence Based Policing: Queensland Police Technical Report
2
8 23
9 2
10 9
11 32
12 1
13 18
14 26
15
Enhancing police legitimacy: Results from the Queensland Community Engagement Trial (QCET)
2
16
Living in Queensland: Preparing for and communicating in disasters and emergencies
7
17 206
18 2
19 2
20
Testing police legitimacy...one breath at a time: The Queensland Community Engagement Trial
10

About Emma Antrobus

Emma Antrobus is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Gender Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (20 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (13 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (889 citations), Sociology and Political Science (990 citations) and Health (150 citations). Emma Antrobus has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Bennett, Lorraine Mazerolle, Tom R. Tyler, Elizabeth Eggins, Elise Sargeant, Kristina Murphy, Alex R. Piquero, Peter Martin, Barak Ariel and Ian M. Thompson. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Criminology and Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026