Emine Şekerdağ
About
In The Last Decade
Emine Şekerdağ
11 papers receiving 508 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Molecular Biology 198
- Pharmaceutical Science 149
- Neurology 134
- Dermatology 63
- Epidemiology 59
Countries citing papers authored by Emine Şekerdağ
This map shows the geographic impact of Emine Şekerdağ's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emine Şekerdağ with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emine Şekerdağ more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emine Şekerdağ
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emine Şekerdağ. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emine Şekerdağ. The network helps show where Emine Şekerdağ may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emine Şekerdağ
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emine Şekerdağ. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emine Şekerdağ based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emine Şekerdağ. Emine Şekerdağ is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 273 | |
| 8 | 48 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 78 | |
| 11 | 56 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.