Emily Smith‐Woolley
Impact in
-
- Cognitive Abilities and Testing
-
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer
- Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Papers in
-
- Cognitive Abilities and Testing 4
- Genetics 5
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer 3
- Genetic Associations and Epidemiology 3
- Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease 1
- Co-authors
- Robert Plomin (9 shared papers)Philip S. Dale (6 shared papers)Kaili Rimfeld (5 shared papers)Yulia Kovas (4 shared papers)Sophie von Stumm (4 shared papers)Robert M. Chapman (2 shared papers)Ilya Zakharov (2 shared papers)Maxim Likhanov (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Developmental Science (2 papers)Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1 paper)npj Science of Learning (1 paper)Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (1 paper)Behavior Genetics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
Emily Smith‐Woolley
12 papers receiving 354 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 90
- Genetics 104
- Education 96
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 34
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 36
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Smith‐Woolley
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Smith‐Woolley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Smith‐Woolley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Smith‐Woolley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Smith‐Woolley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Smith‐Woolley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Smith‐Woolley. The network helps show where Emily Smith‐Woolley may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Smith‐Woolley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 92 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 90 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 45 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 4 |
About Emily Smith‐Woolley
Emily Smith‐Woolley is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Genetics, Sociology and Political Science, Education and Molecular Biology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (3 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (3 papers), School Choice and Performance (2 papers), Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies (2 papers), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (1 paper), Educational and Psychological Assessments (1 paper) and Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (90 citations), Genetics (104 citations), Education (96 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (34 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (36 citations). Emily Smith‐Woolley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Robert Plomin, Philip S. Dale, Kaili Rimfeld, Yulia Kovas, Sophie von Stumm, Robert M. Chapman, Ilya Zakharov, Maxim Likhanov, Ziada Ayorech and Saskia Selzam. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Science, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, npj Science of Learning, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Behavior Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.