Emily Smith‐Woolley

670 total citations
12 papers, 357 citations indexed

About

Emily Smith‐Woolley is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Genetics and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Smith‐Woolley has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 357 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 5 papers in Genetics and 4 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Emily Smith‐Woolley's work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (3 papers) and BRCA gene mutations in cancer (3 papers). Emily Smith‐Woolley is often cited by papers focused on Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (3 papers) and BRCA gene mutations in cancer (3 papers). Emily Smith‐Woolley collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Russia. Emily Smith‐Woolley's co-authors include Robert Plomin, Philip S. Dale, Kaili Rimfeld, Yulia Kovas, Sophie von Stumm, Ziada Ayorech, Ilya Zakharov, Maxim Likhanov, Robert M. Chapman and Saskia Selzam and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Emily Smith‐Woolley

12 papers receiving 345 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily Smith‐Woolley United Kingdom 10 110 106 100 54 51 12 357
Yasmin I. Ahmadzadeh United Kingdom 8 88 0.8× 57 0.5× 92 0.9× 36 0.7× 134 2.6× 22 303
Karson T. F. Kung United Kingdom 11 90 0.8× 72 0.7× 50 0.5× 27 0.5× 82 1.6× 19 376
S Tomkiewicz France 6 52 0.5× 72 0.7× 182 1.8× 86 1.6× 111 2.2× 26 407
Jazmin A. Reyes‐Portillo United States 13 28 0.3× 94 0.9× 45 0.5× 88 1.6× 226 4.4× 27 456
Glenda Fredman United Kingdom 10 40 0.4× 114 1.1× 40 0.4× 32 0.6× 173 3.4× 21 436
Annick Dumaret France 5 31 0.3× 52 0.5× 154 1.5× 88 1.6× 151 3.0× 9 403
Callie W. Little United States 13 26 0.2× 232 2.2× 81 0.8× 23 0.4× 51 1.0× 36 449
Amy L. Paine United Kingdom 11 16 0.1× 79 0.7× 38 0.4× 56 1.0× 164 3.2× 30 319
Chiara Suttora Italy 11 29 0.3× 60 0.6× 47 0.5× 60 1.1× 98 1.9× 35 430
Luigi Pedrabissi Italy 9 26 0.2× 95 0.9× 13 0.1× 57 1.1× 104 2.0× 20 293

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Smith‐Woolley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Smith‐Woolley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Smith‐Woolley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Smith‐Woolley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Smith‐Woolley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Smith‐Woolley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Smith‐Woolley. The network helps show where Emily Smith‐Woolley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Smith‐Woolley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Smith‐Woolley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Smith‐Woolley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Smith‐Woolley. Emily Smith‐Woolley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Rimfeld, Kaili, Margherita Malanchini, Andrea G. Allegrini, et al.. (2021). The winding roads to adulthood: A twin study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(4). e12053–e12053. 8 indexed citations
2.
Stumm, Sophie von, Emily Smith‐Woolley, Rosa Cheesman, et al.. (2020). School quality ratings are weak predictors of students’ achievement and well‐being. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 62(3). 339–348. 13 indexed citations
3.
Hayiou‐Thomas, Marianna E., Emily Smith‐Woolley, & Philip S. Dale. (2020). Breadth versus depth: Cumulative risk model and continuous measure prediction of poor language and reading outcomes at 12. Developmental Science. 24(1). e12998–e12998. 22 indexed citations
4.
Stumm, Sophie von, Emily Smith‐Woolley, Ziada Ayorech, et al.. (2019). Predicting educational achievement from genomic measures and socioeconomic status. Developmental Science. 23(3). e12925–e12925. 89 indexed citations
5.
Smith‐Woolley, Emily, Saskia Selzam, & Robert Plomin. (2019). Polygenic score for educational attainment captures DNA variants shared between personality traits and educational achievement.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 117(6). 1145–1163. 33 indexed citations
6.
Smith‐Woolley, Emily, Jean‐Baptiste Pingault, Saskia Selzam, et al.. (2018). Differences in exam performance between pupils attending selective and non-selective schools mirror the genetic differences between them. npj Science of Learning. 3(1). 3–3. 43 indexed citations
7.
Smith‐Woolley, Emily, Ziada Ayorech, Philip S. Dale, Sophie von Stumm, & Robert Plomin. (2018). The genetics of university success. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 14579–14579. 13 indexed citations
8.
Malanchini, Margherita, Emily Smith‐Woolley, Ziada Ayorech, et al.. (2018). Aggressive behaviour in childhood and adolescence: the role of smoking during pregnancy, evidence from four twin cohorts in the EU-ACTION consortium. Psychological Medicine. 49(4). 646–654. 10 indexed citations
9.
Chapman, Robert M., et al.. (2018). New literacy challenge for the twenty-first century: genetic knowledge is poor even among well educated. Journal of Community Genetics. 10(1). 73–84. 88 indexed citations
10.
Smith‐Woolley, Emily, Kaili Rimfeld, & Robert Plomin. (2017). Weak associations between pubertal development and psychiatric and behavioral problems. Translational Psychiatry. 7(4). e1098–e1098. 19 indexed citations
11.
Chapman, Robert M., et al.. (2017). Genetic Literacy And Attitudes Survey (Iglas): International Population-Wide Assessment Instrument. ˜The œEuropean Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences. 45–66. 15 indexed citations
12.
Ayorech, Ziada, Saskia Selzam, Emily Smith‐Woolley, et al.. (2016). Publication Trends Over 55 Years of Behavioral Genetic Research. Behavior Genetics. 46(5). 603–607. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Yasmin I. Ahmadzadeh Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Karson T. F. Kung Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S Tomkiewicz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jazmin A. Reyes‐Portillo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Glenda Fredman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Annick Dumaret Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Callie W. Little Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Amy L. Paine Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Chiara Suttora Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Luigi Pedrabissi
Rankless by CCL
2026