Emily L. Brown

19 papers receiving 267 citations

Peers

Emily L. Brown
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 16
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 86
  • Health 21
  • Nephrology 14
  • Social Psychology 39
Replace Robert Steppacher with:
Robert Steppacher United States
J. G. Riedel Germany
Isaretta Riley United States
Siân Russell United Kingdom
Jennifer O’Brien Canada
Karen McCabe United Kingdom
Luis Tollinche United States
Jacqueline Fraser Canada
Myriam Dubé Canada
Andrea Weiss United States
Emily L. Brown relative to Robert Steppacher United States Robert Steppacher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Robert Steppacher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily L. Brown

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily L. Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily L. Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily L. Brown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily L. Brown

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily L. Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily L. Brown. The network helps show where Emily L. Brown may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily L. Brown, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily L. Brown Line = papers co-authored together Emily L. Brown links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201488
2 201549
3 202022
4 201720
5 198716
6 201916
7 202213
8 198012
9 201811
10 20247
11 20206
12 20203
13 20213
14 20082
15 20251
16 20251
17 20151
18 19881
19 20241
20 20210

About Emily L. Brown

Emily L. Brown is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Nephrology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 273 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (4 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (3 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (1 paper), Sodium Intake and Health (1 paper), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (1 paper), Thermoregulation and physiological responses (1 paper) and Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (16 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (86 citations), Health (21 citations), Nephrology (14 citations) and Social Psychology (39 citations). Emily L. Brown has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Rob Hallifax, Ari Manuel, Fergus Gleeson, Najib M. Rahman, Mohammed Munavvar, Suzanne H. Lease, Nae Yuh Wang, Karen White, John Campbell and Lisa A. Cooper. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of General Practice, Journal of LGBTQ Issues in Counseling, Journal of Career Development, Health Technology Assessment and Journal of Emergency Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact