Emily J. Lott

29 total papers · 712 total citations
22 papers, 567 citations indexed

About

Emily J. Lott is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Food Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily J. Lott has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 567 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 11 papers in Plant Science and 7 papers in Food Science. Recurrent topics in Emily J. Lott's work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (11 papers), Botanical Research and Applications (7 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (6 papers). Emily J. Lott is often cited by papers focused on Plant Diversity and Evolution (11 papers), Botanical Research and Applications (7 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (6 papers). Emily J. Lott collaborates with scholars based in Mexico, United States and Spain. Emily J. Lott's co-authors include Stephen H. Bullock, Gerardo Segura, Patricia Balvanera, Christina Siebe, Elvira Durán, Jorge A. Meave, Paul A. Fryxell, Jerzy Rzedowski, Martha Martínez-Gordillo and Bijan Dehgan and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Vegetation Science, Biotropica and Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden.

In The Last Decade

Emily J. Lott

19 papers receiving 519 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Emily J. Lott 316 260 182 123 122 22 567
Reynaldo Linares‐Palomino 220 0.7× 255 1.0× 96 0.5× 108 0.9× 96 0.8× 35 506
Laura Arriaga 293 0.9× 155 0.6× 167 0.9× 171 1.4× 137 1.1× 21 565
Mariana Yólotl Álvarez-Añorve 328 1.0× 387 1.5× 245 1.3× 140 1.1× 134 1.1× 23 689
I. de Gusmão Câmara 175 0.6× 194 0.7× 203 1.1× 198 1.6× 56 0.5× 32 525
Pedro P. Garcillán 206 0.7× 194 0.7× 262 1.4× 124 1.0× 154 1.3× 36 635
Gumersindo Sánchez‐Montoya 320 1.0× 307 1.2× 168 0.9× 164 1.3× 156 1.3× 11 639
Moisés Méndez‐Toribio 266 0.8× 98 0.4× 152 0.8× 257 2.1× 64 0.5× 26 520
Fredy Alvarado 293 0.9× 139 0.5× 217 1.2× 152 1.2× 27 0.2× 29 535
Lívia D. Audino 436 1.4× 213 0.8× 203 1.1× 183 1.5× 27 0.2× 23 587
Luis J. Oakley 149 0.5× 209 0.8× 138 0.8× 103 0.8× 138 1.1× 24 556

Countries citing papers authored by Emily J. Lott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily J. Lott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily J. Lott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily J. Lott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily J. Lott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily J. Lott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily J. Lott. The network helps show where Emily J. Lott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily J. Lott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily J. Lott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily J. Lott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily J. Lott. Emily J. Lott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026