Cynthia Skema

9 papers receiving 838 citations

Hit Papers

Recent assembly of the Cerrado, a neotropical plant diver...20092026201420202009250500750

Peers

Cynthia Skema
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 531
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 347
  • Plant Science 223
  • Global and Planetary Change 207
  • Molecular Biology 168
Replace Rosaura Grether with:
Rosaura Grether Mexico
Fernánda Pérez Chile
Gumersindo Sánchez‐Montoya Mexico
Katya Romoleroux Ecuador
Reynaldo Linares‐Palomino Peru
Alejandro Flores‐Palacios Mexico
Milton Aulestia United States
Ana Mendoza Mexico
Jorge O. Chiapella Argentina
Martha Lopezaraiza‐Mikel Mexico
Cynthia Skema relative to Rosaura Grether Mexico Rosaura Grether's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Rosaura Grether · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cynthia Skema

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cynthia Skema's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cynthia Skema with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cynthia Skema more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cynthia Skema

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cynthia Skema. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cynthia Skema. The network helps show where Cynthia Skema may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cynthia Skema

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cynthia Skema. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cynthia Skema based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cynthia Skema. Cynthia Skema is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 6
3 3
4 25
5 6
6 15
7 1
8 7
9
Recent assembly of the Cerrado, a neotropical plant diversity hotspot, by in situ evolution of adaptations to firebreakdown →
785
10
Feeding behavior and performance of a rabbitbrush leaf-beetle ( Trirhabda lewisii ) feeding on Chrysothamnus nauseosus regrowth after fire
2

About Cynthia Skema

Cynthia Skema is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Forestry and Plant Science, having authored 10 papers that have together received 850 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (7 papers), Plant and animal studies (4 papers) and Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (347 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (531 citations) and Ecological Modeling (49 citations). Cynthia Skema has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include R. Toby Pennington, Luciano Paganucci de Queiroz, Colin E. Hughes, Rosaura Grether, Marcelo Fragomeni Simon, Laurence J. Dorr, Jennifer A. Tate, Corrinne E. Grover, Timothée Le Péchon and K. Wolff. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Annals of Botany and Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026