Emily Hajjar
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 0.05%
- Economics and Econometrics top 0.5%
- Family Practice top 0.1%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 2%
- Co-authors
- Joseph T. HanlonRobert L. MaherBhavik M. ShahCatherine I. LindbladCarl F. PieperKenneth E. SchmaderRichard SloaneChristine M. Ruby
- Topics
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (20 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (12 papers)Medication Adherence and Compliance (6 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical OncologyJournal of the American Geriatrics SocietyThe Journals of Gerontology Series A
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Emily Hajjar
28 papers receiving 3.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 2.4k
- Economics and Econometrics 1.2k
- Family Practice 751
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 682
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 449
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Hajjar
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Hajjar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Hajjar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Hajjar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Hajjar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Hajjar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Hajjar. The network helps show where Emily Hajjar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Hajjar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Hajjar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Hajjar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Hajjar. Emily Hajjar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | Deprescribing: A simple method for reducing polypharmacy. | 27 |
| 6 | 26 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 195 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 227 | |
| 14 | 56 | |
| 15 | Polypharmacy in elderly patientsbreakdown → | 899 |
| 16 | 96 | |
| 17 | 170 | |
| 18 | 171 | |
| 19 | 136 | |
| 20 | 51 |
About Emily Hajjar
Emily Hajjar is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Family Practice and Toxicology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (20 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (12 papers) and Medication Adherence and Compliance (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (2.4k citations), Family Practice (751 citations) and Toxicology (221 citations). Emily Hajjar has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Joseph T. Hanlon, Robert L. Maher, Bhavik M. Shah, Catherine I. Lindblad, Carl F. Pieper, Kenneth E. Schmader, Richard Sloane, Christine M. Ruby, Ginah Nightingale and Kristine Swartz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society and The Journals of Gerontology Series A.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.