Richard Sloane
- Oncology top 1%
- Physiology top 1%
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 0.1%
- General Health Professions top 0.5%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Carl F. PieperWendy Demark‐WahnefriedDenise C. SnyderMiriam C. MoreyKenneth E. SchmaderHarvey Jay CohenSusan N. HastingsElizabeth C. Clipp
- Topics
- Cancer survivorship and care (34 papers)Nutrition and Health in Aging (32 papers)Frailty in Older Adults (24 papers)
- Journals
- JAMAJournal of Clinical OncologySHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Richard Sloane
198 papers receiving 7.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 172
- Oncology 2.0k
- Physiology 1.6k
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 1.5k
- General Health Professions 1.4k
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 1.1k
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Sloane
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Sloane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Sloane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Sloane more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Sloane
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Sloane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Sloane. The network helps show where Richard Sloane may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Sloane
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Sloane. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Sloane based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Sloane. Richard Sloane is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 56 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 55 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 97 | |
| 12 | 155 | |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | 45 | |
| 15 | 404 | |
| 16 | 52 | |
| 17 | 139 | |
| 18 | 300 | |
| 19 | 40 | |
| 20 | Is use of mechanical ventilation a reasonable proxy indicator for coma among Medicare patients hospitalized for acute stroke? | 23 |
About Richard Sloane
Richard Sloane is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Family Practice, having authored 204 papers that have together received 7.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (34 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (32 papers) and Frailty in Older Adults (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (1.5k citations), Family Practice (281 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (151 citations). Richard Sloane has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Carl F. Pieper, Wendy Demark‐Wahnefried, Denise C. Snyder, Miriam C. Morey, Kenneth E. Schmader, Harvey Jay Cohen, Susan N. Hastings, Elizabeth C. Clipp, Paige Miller and Joseph T. Hanlon. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Journal of Clinical Oncology and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.